ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2014
Specialties differ in which aspects of doctor communication predict overall physician ratings.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.
- Data Quality Issues With Physician-Rating Websites: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Pooled it
- Examining the Business Case for Patient Experience: A Systematic Review.Journal of healthcare management / American College of Healthcare ExecutivesPooled it
- Randomized controlled trial evaluating feedback to community-based therapists based on patient reports of trust and respect.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology · 2023Trial
- Cost Conversations About Anticoagulation Between Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Their Clinicians: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2021Trial
- Trial
- Administrative Burden and Patient-Provider Communication Quality: Evidence From 11 Years of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Article
- Impact of a Physician Communication Development Program on Patient Experience Scores.Journal of patient experience · 2026Article
- Observational
- Article
- Evaluation of Attitudes to Learning Doctor-Patient Communication Skills in 427 Postgraduate Doctors Using the Communication Skills Attitude Scale (CSAS) Questionnaire.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025Article
- Investigation of the causal relationship between patient portal utilization and patient's self-care self-efficacy and satisfaction in care among patients with cancer.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Associations of Patient Experience With Doctor-Patient Communication and Patient-Reported Physical and Mental Health in Seriously Ill Adults.Journal of patient experience · 2025Article
- Does Communication Effectiveness Assessed by Communication Scholars Correlate with Patient Perception of Clinician Empathy?Journal of patient experience · 2025Article
- How the CAHPS Clinician and Group Patient Experience Survey Data Have Been Used in Research: A Systematic Review.Journal of patient-centered research and reviews · 2024Review
- Associations of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) Clinician and Group Survey Scores with Interventions and Site, Provider, and Patient Factors: A Systematic Review of the Evidence.Journal of patient experience · 2024Article
- Shadow Coaching Improves Patient Experience for English-Preferring Patients but not for Spanish-Preferring Patients.Journal of general internal medicine · 2023Article
- The Use of Web-Based Patient Reviews to Assess Medical Oncologists' Competency: Mixed Methods Sequential Explanatory Study.JMIR formative research · 2023Article
- From the Editor's Desk: the Evolving Journey of Engaging Patients as Research Partners.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Article
- The underlying structure of the English Cancer Patient Experience Survey: Factor analysis to support survey reporting and design.Cancer medicine · 2022Article
- Provider and coach perspectives on implementing shadow coaching to improve provider-patient interactions.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEffective doctor communication is critical to positive doctor-patient relationships and predicts better health outcomes. Doctor communication is the strongest predictor of patient ratings of doctors, but the most important aspects of communication may vary by specialty.
objectiveTo determine the importance of five aspects of doctor communication to overall physician ratings by specialty.
designFor each of 28 specialties, we calculated partial correlations of five communication items with a 0-10 overall physician rating, controlling for patient demographics. PATIENTS: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Clinician and Group (CG-CAHPS®) 12-month Survey data collected 2005-2009 from 58,251 adults at a 534-physician medical group. MAIN MEASURES: CG-CAHPS includes a 0 ("Worst physician possible") to 10 ("Best physician possible") overall physician rating. Five doctor communication items assess how often the physician: explains things; listens carefully; gives easy-to-understand instructions; shows respect; and spends enough time. KEY
resultsPhysician showing respect was the most important aspect of communication for 23/28 specialties, with a mean partial correlation (0.27, ranging from 0.07 to 0.44 across specialties) that accounted for more than four times as much variance in the overall physician rating as any other communication item. Three of five communication items varied significantly across specialties in their associations with the overall rating (p < 0.05).
conclusionsAll patients valued respectful treatment; the importance of other aspects of communication varied significantly by specialty. Quality improvement efforts by all specialties should emphasize physicians showing respect to patients, and each specialty should also target other aspects of communication that matter most to their patients. The results have implications for improving provider quality improvement and incentive programs and the reporting of CAHPS data to patients. Specialists make important contributions to coordinated patient care, and thus customized approaches to measurement, reporting, and quality improvement efforts are important.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.