SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2013
Psychological interventions for depression in adolescent and adult congenital heart disease.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.
- Psychological interventions for depression in adolescent and adult congenital heart disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Effects of psychosocial support interventions on survival in inpatient and outpatient healthcare settings: A meta-analysis of 106 randomized controlled trials.PLoS medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Cognitive-behavioural therapy for a variety of conditions: an overview of systematic reviews and panoramic meta-analysis.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2021Pooled it
- Psychological therapies for anxiety and depression in children and adolescents with long-term physical conditions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- E-Health interventions for anxiety and depression in children and adolescents with long-term physical conditions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Neurodevelopmental and psychosocial interventions for individuals with CHD: a research agenda and recommendations from the Cardiac Neurodevelopmental Outcome Collaborative.Cardiology in the young · 2021Article
- Inpatient rehabilitation for adult patients with Marfan syndrome: an observational pilot study.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2017Observational
- Potential and Limitations of Cochrane Reviews in Pediatric Cardiology: A Systematic Analysis.Pediatric cardiology · 2017Review
- A pilot study of a mindfulness based stress reduction program in adolescents with implantable cardioverter defibrillators or pacemakers.Pediatric cardiology · 2015Article
- Psychosocial adjustment and quality of life of adolescents and adults with congenital heart disease.Korean journal of pediatrics · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdult and adolescent congenital heart disease is increasing in prevalence as better medical care means more children are surviving to adulthood. People with chronic disease often also experience depression. There are several non-pharmacological treatments that might be effective in treating depression and improving quality of life for adults and young adults with congenital heart disease. The aim of this review was to assess the effects of treatments such as psychotherapy, cognitive behavioural therapies and talking therapies for treating depression in this population.
objectivesTo update the previous review on the effects (both harms and benefits) of psychological interventions for treating depression in young adults and adults with congenital heart disease. Psychological interventions include cognitive behavioural therapy, psychotherapy, or 'talking/counselling' therapy for depression. SEARCH
methodsWe updated the searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) on The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2013), MEDLINE (OVID, 1946 to January week 4 2013), EMBASE (OVID, 1980 to 2013 week 05), PsycINFO (OVID, 1806 to January week 5 2013), the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness (DARE) on The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2013), BIOSIS (Thomson Reuters, 1969 to 21 February 2013), and CINAHL (January 1980 to February 2013) on 5 February 2013. We did not search abstracts from national and international cardiology and psychology conferences and dissertation abstracts for this update. No language restrictions were applied. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials comparing psychological interventions with no intervention for people over 15 years with depression who have congenital heart disease. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently screened titles and abstracts of studies that were potentially relevant to the review. We rejected studies that were clearly ineligible. Two review authors independently assessed the abstracts or full papers for inclusion criteria. We sought further information from the authors where papers contained insufficient information to make a decision about eligibility. MAIN
resultsWe did not identify any randomised controlled trials that met the inclusion criteria. AUTHORS'
conclusionsDepression is common in people with congenital heart disease and can exacerbate the physical consequences of the illness. There are effective pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for depression, but we have not been able to identify any trials showing the effectiveness of non-pharmacological treatments. A well-designed randomised controlled trial is needed to assess the effects of psychological interventions for depression in congenital heart disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.