Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24163058›Full record

Trial reportTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2014

A randomized clinical trial of nerve block to manage end-stage pancreatic cancerous pain.

Ling Gao, Yi-jin Yang, Hai-yan Xu, Jin Zhou, Han Hong, Yun-liang Wang, De-chun Li

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 89% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ling GaoDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Yi-jin Yang
Hai-yan Xu
Jin Zhou
Han Hong
Yun-liang Wang
De-chun Li
Soochow University · CNSuzhou Kowloon Hospital · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University · CNSuzhou Municipal Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pain control is the most difficult puzzle in patients with terminal pancreatic cancerous pain. Many methods in clinical practice fail in 20 ~ 50% of patients. The present study aims to explore the effect of nerve block on patients with end-stage pancreatic cancerous pain. In this study, 100 subjects with end-stage pancreatic cancerous pain were enrolled and randomly assigned into two groups: 68 in nerve block group (N) and 32 in sham group (S). One group was treated with nerve block and the other group with sham procedure as controls. The pain score (by visual analog scale (VAS)), pain duration, reduction of other analgesic medications, and quality of life (with questionnaire QLQ) were evaluated before and 3 months after interventions. Comparisons were performed between before and after intervention in nerve block group and sham group. The results indicated that compared with sham group, the subjects in nerve block group had significant reduction with pain score, pain duration, and other analgesic medications, as well as improvement of quality of life (P < 0.05, respectively). In conclusion, nerve block is an effective method for treating patients with end-stage pancreatic cancerous pain.

Indexed as

AgedAnesthetics, LocalBupivacaineCeliac PlexusFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNerve BlockPainPain MeasurementPancreatic NeoplasmsQuality of LifeAnesthetics, LocalBupivacaine

Identifiers

PMID24163058
OpenAlexW2039777535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.