ReviewProtoplasma2014
Super-resolution localization microscopy with photoactivatable fluorescent marker proteins.
Review in Protoplasma, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Methods to Visualize the Actin Cytoskeleton During Plant Cell Division.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Review
- Fluorescent proteins of the EosFP clade: intriguing marker tools with multiple photoactivation modes for advanced microscopy.RSC chemical biology · 2021Review
- Multi-color structured illumination microscopy for live cell imaging based on the enhanced image recombination transform algorithm.Biomedical optics express · 2021Article
- Advances in High-Speed Structured Illumination Microscopy.Frontiers in physics · 2021Article
- Cytomixis in plants: facts and doubts.Protoplasma · 2018Review
- Super-resolution Microscopy - Applications in Plant Cell Research.Frontiers in plant science · 2017Review
- Monomeric Garnet, a far-red fluorescent protein for live-cell STED imaging.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- From gross anatomy to the nanomorphome: stereological tools provide a paradigm for advancing research in quantitative morphomics.Journal of anatomy · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fluorescent proteins (FPs) have become popular imaging tools because of their high specificity, minimal invasive labeling and allowing visualization of proteins and structures inside living organisms. FPs are genetically encoded and expressed in living cells, therefore, labeling involves minimal effort in comparison to approaches involving synthetic dyes. Photoactivatable FPs (paFPs) comprise a subclass of FPs that can change their absorption/emission properties such as brightness and color upon irradiation. This methodology has found a broad range of applications in the life sciences, especially in localization-based super-resolution microscopy of cells, tissues and even entire organisms. In this review, we discuss recent developments and applications of paFPs in super-resolution localization imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.