Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24162855›Full record

ReviewOrganogenesis2014

Wnt and planar cell polarity signaling in cystic renal disease.

Paraskevi Goggolidou

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Organogenesis, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Nephronophthisis: a pathological and genetic perspective.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Cyst Reduction by Melatonin in a NovelMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Wnt Signaling in Kidney Development and Disease.Progress in molecular biology and translational science · 2018
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paraskevi GoggolidouMammalian Genetics Unit; MRC Harwell; Oxfordshire, UK.
Berkshire Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire Wildlife Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cystic kidney diseases can cause end stage renal disease, affecting millions of individuals worldwide. They may arise early or later in life, are characterized by a spectrum of symptoms and can be caused by diverse genetic defects. The primary cilium, a microtubule-based organelle that can serve as a signaling antenna, has been demonstrated to have a significant role in ensuring correct kidney development and function. In the kidney, one of the signaling pathways that requires the cilium for normal development is Wnt signaling. In this review, the roles of primary cilia in relation to canonical and non-canonical Wnt/PCP signaling in cystic renal disease are described. The evidence of the associations between cilia, Wnt signaling and cystic renal disease is discussed and the significance of planar cell polarity-related mechanisms in cystic kidney disease is presented. Although defective Wnt signaling is not the only cause of renal disease, research is increasingly highlighting its importance, encouraging the development of Wnt-associated diagnostic and prognostic tools for cystic renal disease.

Indexed as

Signal TransductionCell PolarityCiliaHumansKidneyKidney Diseases, CysticWnt ProteinsWnt Proteinsciliacystic renal diseasekidney morphogenesisplanar cell polarityWnt signalling

Identifiers

PMID24162855
PMCPMC4049898
OpenAlexW2077132269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.