Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24162611›Full record

ArticleBone marrow transplantation2014

Survey of CMV management in pediatric allogeneic HSCT programs, on behalf of the inborn errors, infectious diseases and pediatric diseases working parties of EBMT.

T Bontant, P Sedlaçek, A Balduzzi, B Gaspar, S Cesaro, H Einsele, C Peters, J-H Dalle

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cytomegalovirus Infection in Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Risk Factors for Primary Infection and Cases of Recurrent and Late Infection at a Single Center.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

T BontantDepartment of Hematology and Immunology, Hospital Robert Debre, Paris 7-Paris Diderot University, Paris, France.
P SedlaçekDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Motol, 2nd Medical School, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
A BalduzziClinica Pediatrica Università degli Studi di Milano Bicocca, Ospedale San Gerardo, Monza (Milano), Italy.
B GasparChair of EBMT Inborn Error Working Party, Molecular Immunology Unit, UCL Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
S CesaroChair of EBMT Infectious Disease Working Party, Paediatric Haematology Oncology Policlinico G.B. Rossi, Verona, Italy.
H EinseleDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
C PetersChair of EBMT Paediatric Diseases Working Party, St Anna Children's Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
J-H DalleDepartment of Hematology and Immunology, Hospital Robert Debre, Paris 7-Paris Diderot University, Paris, France.
Université Paris Cité · FRCharles University · CZSt Anna Children's Hospital · ATUniversitätsklinikum Würzburg · DEUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human CMV infection is a frequent complication after HSC in children with remarkable morbidity and mortality. Antiviral drugs are relatively efficient but have numerous side effects. They are used as prophylactic, pre-emptive or therapeutic medicines. It is still a matter of debate which option is the best strategy. No uniform procedure has emerged regarding these three options, and new immunologic tools have raised more questions for physicians. To assess the current practice in the management of CMV infection, we sent a questionnaire to the EBMT centers performing hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) in children. Fifty-six out of 196 responded to the questionnaire (28.5%). Quantitative PCR was the most common monitoring tool (44/56). Only 4/56 centers use the pp65 antigenemia alone. All centers used pre-emptive strategy (56/56). 21/56 centers also used prophylactic measures, 13/21 after analysis of donor/receptor serologic status. Ganciclovir was the most common first-line agent for CMV disease (55/56). The most common dose and duration for induction treatment were 5 mg/kg bid (47/55) for 14 days (20/55). There is no uniform procedure for researching resistance strain, antiviral second-line therapy or cell therapy. A harmonization process should enable sound prospective trials to improve prevention, control and cure of CMV disease in children and adolescents.

Indexed as

Cytomegalovirus InfectionsHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesTransplantation Conditioning

Identifiers

PMID24162611
OpenAlexW2107730066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.