Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24162260›Full record

Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2014

Delaying skeletal-related events in a randomized phase 3 study of denosumab versus zoledronic acid in patients with advanced cancer: an analysis of data from patients with solid tumors.

David Henry, Saroj Vadhan-Raj, Vera Hirsh, Roger von Moos, Vania Hungria, Luis Costa, Penella J Woll, Giorgio Scagliotti, Geoffrey Smith, Amy Feng and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00330759 (A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study of Denosumab Compared With Zoledronic Acid), which is not on this map. Cited by 94 papers, 15 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed, 15 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00330759 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study of Denosumab Compared With Zoledronic Acid (Zometa) in the Treatment of Bone Metastases in Subjects With Advanced Cancer (Excluding Breast and Prostate Cancer) or Multiple Myeloma.

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmgenRan2006 to 2011Enrolled1,779ConditionsBone MetastasesArmsDenosumab, Zoledronic Acid
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed, 15 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 182 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Differences between bisphosphonate-related and denosumab-related osteonecrosis of the jaws: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Denosumab versus bisphosphonates for the treatment of bone metastases from solid tumors: a systematic review.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2019
    Pooled it
  11. Denosumab versus bisphosphonates in patients with advanced cancers-related bone metastasis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2018
    Pooled it
  12. Bisphosphonates in multiple myeloma: an updated network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  13. SEOM Clinical Guideline for bone metastases from solid tumours (2016).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2016
    Guideline
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Pain and analgesic use associated with skeletal-related events in patients with advanced cancer and bone metastases.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016
    Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Article

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 9 institutions in 7 countries.

David HenryJoan Karnell Cancer Center, Pennsylvania Hospital, 230 W Washington Square, Philadelphia, PA, 19106, USA, davidhenry@pennoncology.com.
Saroj Vadhan-Raj
Vera Hirsh
Roger von Moos
Vania Hungria
Luis Costa
Penella J Woll
Giorgio Scagliotti
Geoffrey Smith
Amy Feng
Susie Jun
Roger Dansey
Howard Yeh
Amgen (United States) · USInstituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo AntunesIrmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo · BRKantonsspital Graubünden · CHMcGill University Health Centre · CAPennsylvania Hospital · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Sheffield · GBUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBone complications of metastatic disease, including skeletal-related events (SREs), impair patients' functioning and quality of life. In a randomized, phase 3 trial of 1,776 patients with metastases from solid tumors (except breast or prostate) or multiple myeloma, denosumab was non-inferior to zoledronic acid (ZA) in delaying or preventing SREs. This ad hoc analysis reports outcomes in the subgroup of 1,597 patients with solid tumors, excluding patients with multiple myeloma.

methodsPatients received monthly subcutaneous denosumab 120 mg or intravenous ZA 4 mg, adjusted for creatinine clearance, with calcium and vitamin D supplementation recommended. Endpoints included times to first on-study SRE, first-and-subsequent SREs, and pain worsening.

resultsDenosumab significantly delayed time to first on-study SRE compared with ZA (HR, 0.81; 95 % CI, 0.68-0.96) and time to first-and-subsequent SREs (RR, 0.85; 95 % CI, 0.72-1.00). Denosumab also significantly delayed time to development of moderate or severe pain (HR, 0.81; 95 % CI, 0.66-1.00), pain worsening (HR, 0.83; 95 % CI, 0.71-0.97), and worsening pain interference in patients with no/mild baseline pain (HR, 0.77; 95 % CI, 0.61-0.96). Adverse event rates were 96 % in both groups. Grade 3 or 4 hypocalcemia, mostly without clinical sequelae, was more frequent in denosumab-treated patients (denosumab 4 %, ZA 2 %). Osteonecrosis of the jaw occurred infrequently (denosumab 0.8 %, ZA 1.1 %).

conclusionsDenosumab was more effective in delaying or preventing SREs in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors and also prevented pain progression compared to ZA in this ad hoc analysis.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBone Density Conservation AgentsBone NeoplasmsBone ResorptionDenosumabDiphosphonatesDisease ProgressionDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansImidazolesKaplan-Meier EstimateAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBone Density Conservation AgentsDenosumabDiphosphonatesImidazolesZoledronic Acid

Identifiers

PMID24162260
OpenAlexW2066699153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.