Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24161788›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2014

A microchip for quantitative analysis of CNS axon growth under localized biomolecular treatments.

Jaewon Park, Sunja Kim, Su Inn Park, Yoonsuck Choe, Jianrong Li, Arum Han

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Neurons-on-a-Chip:Molecules and cells · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Application of New Materials in Auditory Disease Treatment.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. The Need for Physiological Micro-Nanofluidic Systems of the Brain.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jaewon ParkDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Sunja Kim
Su Inn Park
Yoonsuck Choe
Jianrong Li
Arum Han
Texas A&M University · US

Funding

Glial Interactions in Premyelinating Oligodendrocyte DestructionR01NS060017 · NINDS · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI LI, JIANRONG · 2007 to 2010
$1.3M
A High-Throughput Microfluidic in vitro CNS Myelination Model towards Drug ScreeningR21EB021005 · NIBIB · TEXAS ENGINEERING EXPERIMENT STATION · PI HAN, ARUM · 2015 to 2016
$396k
CNS Myelination Co-Culture Microsystem for Axon-Gila SignalingR21MH085267 · NIMH · TEXAS ENGINEERING EXPERIMENT STATION · PI HAN, ARUM · 2009 to 2010
$387k
Glial Interactions in Premyelinating Oligodendrocyte DestructionR56NS060017 · NINDS · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI LI, JIANRONG · 2012 to 2012
$351k
NIMH NIH HHS 1R21MH085267NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH085267NINDS NIH HHS NS060017NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS060017NINDS NIH HHS R56 NS060017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Growth capability of neurons is an essential factor in axon regeneration. To better understand how microenvironments influence axon growth, methods that allow spatial control of cellular microenvironments and easy quantification of axon growth are critically needed. Here, we present a microchip capable of physically guiding the growth directions of axons while providing physical and fluidic isolation from neuronal somata/dendrites that enables localized biomolecular treatments and linear axon growth. The microchip allows axons to grow in straight lines inside the axon compartments even after the isolation; therefore, significantly facilitating the axon length quantification process. We further developed an image processing algorithm that automatically quantifies axon growth. The effect of localized extracellular matrix components and brain-derived neurotropic factor treatments on axon growth was investigated. Results show that biomolecules may have substantially different effects on axon growth depending on where they act. For example, while chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan causes axon retraction when added to the axons, it promotes axon growth when applied to the somata. The newly developed microchip overcomes limitations of conventional axon growth research methods that lack localized control of biomolecular environments and are often performed at a significantly lower cell density for only a short period of time due to difficulty in monitoring of axonal growth. This microchip may serve as a powerful tool for investigating factors that promote axon growth and regeneration.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsLab-On-A-Chip DevicesAnimalsAxonsBrainCells, CulturedNerve RegenerationNeuronsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyAutomated measurementAxon growth rateCompartmentalized cultureLocalized biomolecular treatmentMicrofluidic culture platformQuantitative axon length analysis

Identifiers

PMID24161788
PMCPMC3863683
OpenAlexW2014107797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.