Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24161323›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the American College of Cardiology2014

Lipoprotein(a) for risk assessment in patients with established coronary artery disease.

Michelle L O'Donoghue, David A Morrow, Sotirios Tsimikas, Sarah Sloan, Angela F Ren, Elaine B Hoffman, Nihar R Desai, Scott D Solomon, Michael Domanski, Kiyohito Arai and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 209 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Lipoprotein(a) Does Not Correlate with Hypertensive Mediated Organ Damage and Subsequent Cardiovascular Events in a Primary Prevention Cohort.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. The Emerging Lipid Risk: Lipoprotein(a).Korean circulation journal · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Michelle L O'DonoghueTIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: modonoghue@partners.org.
David A MorrowTIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Sotirios TsimikasDivision of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Sarah SloanTIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Angela F RenTIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Elaine B HoffmanTIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Nihar R DesaiSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine; Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Health System, New Haven, Connecticut.
Scott D SolomonCardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Michael DomanskiMount Sinai School of Medicine, Cardiovascular Division, New York, New York.
Kiyohito AraiDivision of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California; Division of Cardiology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Stephanie E ChiuveDivision of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Christopher P CannonTIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Frank M SacksChanning Laboratory and Cardiology Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Marc S SabatineTIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USUniversity of California San Diego · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USYale University · US

Funding

Metabolomic Biomarkers of Early Myocardial InjuryR01HL098280 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI GERSZTEN, ROBERT E, SABATINE, MARC S · 2010 to 2014
$3.7M
Discovery & Application of Proteomics-Based Biomarkers of Early Myocardial InjuryR01HL096738 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI CARR, STEVEN A, GERSZTEN, ROBERT E · 2009 to 2012
$2.9M
Novel Biomarkers to Identify Vulnerable Patients with Coronary Artery DiseaseR01HL094390 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SABATINE, MARC S · 2009 to 2012
$1.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL094390NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL094390NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL096738NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL096738NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL098280
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe purpose of this study was to assess the prognostic utility of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] in individuals with coronary artery disease (CAD).

backgroundData regarding an association between Lp(a) and cardiovascular (CV) risk in secondary prevention populations are sparse.

methodsPlasma Lp(a) was measured in 6,708 subjects with CAD from 3 studies; data were then combined with 8 previously published studies for a total of 18,978 subjects.

resultsAcross the 3 studies, increasing levels of Lp(a) were not associated with the risk of CV events when modeled as a continuous variable (odds ratio [OR]: 1.03 per log-transformed SD, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.96 to 1.11) or by quintile (Q5:Q1 OR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.83 to 1.34). When data were combined with previously published studies of Lp(a) in secondary prevention, subjects with Lp(a) levels in the highest quantile were at increased risk of CV events (OR: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.15 to 1.71), but with significant between-study heterogeneity (p = 0.001). When stratified on the basis of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, the association between Lp(a) and CV events was significant in studies in which average LDL cholesterol was ≥130 mg/dl (OR: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.23 to 1.73, p < 0.001), whereas this relationship did not achieve statistical significance for studies with an average LDL cholesterol <130 mg/dl (OR: 1.20, 95% CI: 0.90 to 1.60, p = 0.21).

conclusionsLp(a) is significantly associated with the risk of CV events in patients with established CAD; however, there exists marked heterogeneity across trials. In particular, the prognostic value of Lp(a) in patients with low cholesterol levels remains unclear.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeBiomarkersCoronary Artery DiseaseHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsLipoprotein(a)PrognosisRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk AssessmentSecondary PreventionBiomarkersHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsLipoprotein(a)biomarkerslipoprotein(a)risk stratificationsecondary prevention

Identifiers

PMID24161323
PMCPMC3945105
OpenAlexW1994699782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.