Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24160259›Full record

ArticleTransplantation research2013

Standardization of whole blood immune phenotype monitoring for clinical trials: panels and methods from the ONE study.

Mathias Streitz, Tewfik Miloud, Michael Kapinsky, Michael R Reed, Robert Magari, Edward K Geissler, James A Hutchinson, Katrin Vogt, Stephan Schlickeiser, Anders Handrup Kverneland and 3 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 110 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
110citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03388008 phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of De Novo Belatacept-Based Immunosuppression in Lung Transplantation

TypeinterventionalSponsorWashington University School of MedicineRan2019 to 2022Enrolled27ConditionsLung Transplant Rejection, Antibody-mediated RejectionArmsBelatacept, Tacrolimus, ATG, Mycophenolate Mofetil, Methylprednisolone
NCT04158544 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Immune Monitoring During Systemic Therapy of Metastatic Malignant Melanoma

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of RegensburgRan2016 to 2021Enrolled100ConditionsMetastatic Melanoma
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

110 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 216 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Peripheral Blood Immune Cell Composition After Autologous MSC Infusion in Kidney Transplantation Recipients.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2023
    Trial
  3. Autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cell therapy with early tacrolimus withdrawal: The randomized prospective, single-center, open-label TRITON study.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2021
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Immunophenotyping of B-Cell Subpopulations by Flow Cytometry.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Prognostic implications of a CD8Frontiers in immunology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

50 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mathias Streitz
Tewfik Miloud
Michael Kapinsky
Michael R Reed
Robert Magari
Edward K Geissler
James A Hutchinson
Katrin Vogt
Stephan Schlickeiser
Anders Handrup Kverneland
Christian Meisel
Hans-Dieter Volk
Birgit SawitzkiInstitute of Medical Immunology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin 13353, Germany. birgit.sawitzki@charite.de.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEBeckman Coulter Foundation · USBerlin-Brandenburger Centrum für Regenerative Therapien · DEUniversity of Regensburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmune monitoring by flow cytometry is a fast and highly informative way of studying the effects of novel therapeutics aimed at reducing transplant rejection or treating autoimmune diseases. The ONE Study consortium has recently initiated a series of clinical trials aimed at using different cell therapies to promote tolerance to renal allografts. To compare the effectiveness of different cell therapies, the consortium developed a robust immune monitoring strategy, including procedures for whole blood (WB) leukocyte subset profiling by flow cytometry.

methodsSix leukocyte profiling panels computing 7- to 9-surface marker antigens for monitoring the major leukocyte subsets as well as characteristics of T cell, B cell, and dendritic cell (DC) subsets were designed. The precision and variability of these panels were estimated. The assay was standardized within eight international laboratories using Flow-Set Pro beads for mean fluorescence intensity target definition and the flow cytometer setup procedure. Standardization was demonstrated by performing inter-site comparisons.

resultsOptimized methods for sample collection, storage, preparation, and analysis were established, including protocols for gating target subsets. WB specimen age testing demonstrated that staining must be performed within 4 hours of sample collection to keep variability low, meaning less than or equal to 10% for the majority of defined leukocyte subsets. Inter-site comparisons between all participating centers testing shipped normal WB revealed good precision, with a variability of 0.05% to 30% between sites. Intra-assay analyses revealed a variability of 0.05% to 20% for the majority of subpopulations. This was dependent on the frequency of the particular subset, with smaller subsets showing higher variability. The intra-assay variability performance defined limits of quantitation (LoQ) for subsets, which will be the basis for assessing statistically significant differences achieved by the different cell therapies.

conclusionsLocal performance and central analysis of the ONE Study flow cytometry panel yields acceptable variability in a standardized assay at multiple international sites. These panels and procedures with WB allow unmanipulated analysis of changes in absolute cell numbers of leukocyte subsets in single- or multicenter clinical trials. Accordingly, we propose the ONE Study panel may be adopted as a standardized method for monitoring patients in clinical trials enrolling transplant patients, particularly trials of novel tolerance promoting therapies, to facilitate fair and meaningful comparisons between trials.

Identifiers

PMID24160259
PMCPMC3827923
OpenAlexW2151829671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.