Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24160245›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2013

LPA, HGF, and EGF utilize distinct combinations of signaling pathways to promote migration and invasion of MDA-MB-231 breast carcinoma cells.

Susan M W Harrison, Teresa Knifley, Min Chen, Kathleen L O'Connor

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Using the Dot Assay to Analyze Migration of Cell Sheets.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Susan M W Harrison
Teresa Knifley
Min Chen
Kathleen L O'ConnorMarkey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, 741 S, Limestone Street, Lexington 40506-0509, USA. kloconnor@uky.edu.
Markey Cancer Center · USUniversity of Kentucky · US

Funding

Novel Mechanisms of Carcinoma Cell MigrationR01CA109136 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI O'CONNOR, KATHLEEN L. · 2006 to 2016
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA109136NCI NIH HHS R01CA109136
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVarious pathways impinge on the actin-myosin pathway to facilitate cell migration and invasion including members of the Rho family of small GTPases and MAPK. However, the signaling components that are considered important for these processes vary substantially within the literature with certain pathways being favored. These distinctions in signaling pathways utilized are often attributed to differences in cell type or physiological conditions; however, these attributes have not been systematically assessed.

methodsTo address this question, we analyzed the migration and invasion of MDA-MB-231 breast carcinoma cell line in response to various stimuli including lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and epidermal growth factor (EGF) and determined the involvement of select signaling pathways that impact myosin light chain phosphorylation.

resultsLPA, a potent stimulator of the Rho-ROCK pathway, surprisingly did not require the Rho-ROCK pathway to stimulate migration but instead utilized Rac and MAPK. In contrast, LPA-stimulated invasion required Rho, Rac, and MAPK. Of these three major pathways, EGF-stimulated MDA-MB-231 migration and invasion required Rho; however, Rac was essential only for invasion and MAPK was dispensable for migration. HGF signaling, interestingly, utilized the same pathways for migration and invasion, requiring Rho but not Rac signaling. Notably, the dependency of HGF-stimulated migration and invasion as well as EGF-stimulated invasion on MAPK was subject to the inhibitors used. As expected, myosin light chain kinase (MLCK), a convergence point for MAPK and Rho family GTPase signaling, was required for all six conditions.

conclusionsThese observations suggest that, while multiple signaling pathways contribute to cancer cell motility, not all pathways operate under all conditions. Thus, our study highlights the plasticity of cancer cells to adapt to multiple migratory cues.

Indexed as

Cell MovementSignal TransductionActinsBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorEpidermal Growth FactorFemaleHepatocyte Growth FactorHumansLysophospholipidsMitogen-Activated Protein KinasesMyosin-Light-Chain KinaseMyosinsNeoplasm Invasivenessrac GTP-Binding Proteinsrho GTP-Binding ProteinsActinsEpidermal Growth FactorHepatocyte Growth Factorlysophosphatidic acidLysophospholipidsMitogen-Activated Protein KinasesMyosin-Light-Chain KinaseMyosinsrac GTP-Binding Proteinsrho GTP-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24160245
PMCPMC3819718
OpenAlexW2156362784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.