Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24159487›Full record

ReviewOsong public health and research perspectives2012

In vivo Noninvasive Small Animal Molecular Imaging.

Hyewon Youn, Kee-Jong Hong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Osong public health and research perspectives, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. International journal of stem cells · 2023
    Review
  3. Advances in NK cell therapy for brain tumors.NPJ precision oncology · 2023
    Review
  4. Medical Imaging Technology and Imaging Agents.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. DNA nanomaterials for preclinical imaging and drug delivery.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2016
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hyewon YounDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Imaging Center, Seoul National University Cancer Hospital, Seoul, Korea ; Laboratory of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Kee-Jong Hong

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The remarkable efforts that are made on molecular imaging technologies demonstrate its potential importance and range of applications. The generation of disease-specific animal models, and the developments of target-specific probes and genetically encoded reporters are another important component. Continued improvements in the instrumentation, the identification of novel targets and genes, and the availability of improved imaging probes should be made. Multimodal imaging probes should provide easier transitions between laboratory studies, including small animal studies and clinical applications. Here, we reviewed basic strategies of noninvasive in vivo imaging methods in small animals to introducing the concept of molecular imaging.

Indexed as

animal imagingcomputed tomographymagnetic resonance imagingnuclear imagingoptical imagingultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID24159487
PMCPMC3738683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.