ArticleCurrent genetic medicine reports2013
Biobanking: The Melding of Research with Clinical Care.
Article in Current genetic medicine reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- When families bridge the research-clinical divide: An exploration of values regarding cascade screening in genomic research.Genetics in medicine open · 2025Article
- Studying the impact of translational genomic research: Lessons from eMERGE.American journal of human genetics · 2023Review
- A Preliminary Study to Explore the Informed Consent Approach and the Ethical Challenges in the Malaysian Biobanking for Research.Asian bioethics review · 2023Article
- The Evolution of a Large Biobank at Mass General Brigham.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Equitable Participation in Biobanks: The Risks and Benefits of a "Dynamic Consent" Approach.Frontiers in public health · 2018Article
- Enhancing Electronic Health Record Data with Geospatial Information.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2017Article
- Engaging diverse populations in biospecimen donation: results from the Hoy y Mañana study.Journal of community genetics · 2016Article
- Proceedings of the 1st Puerto Rico Biobanking Workshop.Reviews on recent clinical trials · 2014Review
- The evolution of withdrawal: negotiating research relationships in biobanking.Life sciences, society and policy · 2014Article
- Enhancement of Pathologist's Routine Practice: Reuse of DNA Extracted from Immunostained Formalin-fixed Paraffin-embedded (FFPE) Slides in Downstream Molecular Analysis of Cancer.Cancer genomics & proteomicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The number of biobanks around the world has increased dramatically, owing in part, to the need for researchers to have access to large numbers of samples for genomic research. Policies for enrolling participants, returning research results and obtaining samples and data can have a far reaching impact on the type of research that can be performed with each biobank. Research using biobank samples includes studies of the impact of environmental and other risk exposures on health, understanding genetic risks for common disease, identification of biomarkers in disease progression and prognosis, and implementation of personalized medicine projects. This research has been instrumental in the progress of genetic and genomic research and translational medicine. This article will highlight some of the controversies and recent research associated with biobanking over the past year.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.