ArticleThe Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy2013
Assessing the impact of an expanded scope of practice for pharmacists at a community hospital.
Article in The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prioritizing Quality over Quantity: Defining Optimal Pharmacist-to-Patient Ratios to Ensure Comprehensive Direct Patient Care in a Medical or Surgical Unit.The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy · 2024Article
- Exploration of health professional stakeholders' views and experiences regarding minor ailments services' education, training and assessment.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2021Article
- How Hospital Pharmacists Spend Their Time: A Work-Sampling Study.The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy · 2020Article
- What will make hospital pharmacists successful as they take on an expanded scope of practice?The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy · 2013Article
- [Not Available].The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy · 2013Article
- The Advanced Pharmacist Practitioner: A New Series in theThe Canadian journal of hospital pharmacyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.