Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24159217›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of pharmaceutical education2013

Student scientific inquiry in the core curriculum.

Georgeta D Vaidean, Sandeep S Vansal, Ronnie J Moore, Stuart Feldman

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of pharmaceutical education, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Practical Insights for the Pharmacist Educator on Student Engagement.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2016
    Review
  9. "Thinking like a Neuroscientist": Using Scaffolded Grant Proposals to Foster Scientific Thinking in a Freshman Neuroscience Course.Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Georgeta D VaideanTouro College of Pharmacy, New York, New York.
Sandeep S Vansal
Ronnie J Moore
Stuart Feldman

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo design and implement a required student-driven research program as a capstone experience in the doctor of pharmacy (PharmD) curriculum.

designA research proposal in the form of a competitive grant application was required for each of 65 fourth-year students in an inaugural PharmD class at Touro College of Pharmacy in New York. The focus of the proposals was on hypothesis-driven research in basic science, clinical research, health outcomes, and public health. ASSESSMENT: Students' research proposals were graded using a standardized grading instrument. On a post-experience survey, most students rated the overall experience positively, indicating increased confidence in their research skills. About two-thirds of faculty members were satisfied with their students' performance, and the great majority thought the experience would be useful in the students' careers.

conclusionThe capstone research project was a positive experience for fourth-year students.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchCurriculumEducation, PharmacyStudents, PharmacyEducational MeasurementHumanscurriculumresearchscholarshipstudent research

Identifiers

PMID24159217
PMCPMC3806960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.