Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24159046›Full record

ArticleScience (New York, N.Y.)2013

Fine tuning of craniofacial morphology by distant-acting enhancers.

Catia Attanasio, Alex S Nord, Yiwen Zhu, Matthew J Blow, Zirong Li, Denise K Liberton, Harris Morrison, Ingrid Plajzer-Frick, Amy Holt, Roya Hosseini and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science (New York, N.Y.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 143 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
143citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

143 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Association ofGenes · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

83 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Catia AttanasioLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Alex S Nord
Yiwen Zhu
Matthew J Blow
Zirong Li
Denise K Liberton
Harris Morrison
Ingrid Plajzer-Frick
Amy Holt
Roya Hosseini
Sengthavy Phouanenavong
Jennifer A Akiyama
Malak Shoukry
Veena Afzal
Edward M Rubin
David R FitzPatrick
Bing Ren
Benedikt Hallgrímsson
Len A Pennacchio
Axel Visel

Funding

Generation of an In Vivo Human Genome Transcriptional Enhancer DatasetR01HG003988 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI Len Alexander Pennacchio · 2006 to 2026
$24.1M
Center for Mammalian Regulatory GenomicsU54HG006997 · NHGRI · LUDWIG INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES LTD · PI REN, BING · 2012 to 2016
$14.3M
The role of continuous phenotypic variation in structural defects of the faceR01DE019638 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Benedikt Hallgrimsson, Ralph S Marcucio · 2010 to 2026
$7.3M
Genetic Determinants of Orofacial Shape and Relationship to Cleft Lip/PalateU01DE020054 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SPRITZ, RICHARD ANDREW · 2009 to 2014
$2.4M
Genome-wide map of active promoters in the mouse cellsR01HG003991 · NHGRI · LUDWIG INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES LTD · PI REN, BING · 2008 to 2011
$2.3M
Research Project: Genome-Wide Atlas of Craniofacial Transcriptional EnhancersU01DE020060 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI VISEL, AXEL · 2009 to 2013
$2.1M
Developmental mechanisms underlying genotype-phenotype correlationsR01DE021708 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HALLGRIMSSON, BENEDIKT, MARCUCIO, RALPH S · 2011 to 2015
$1.9M
Developmental and evolutionary dynamics of tissue-specific mammalian enhancers.F32GM105202 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI NORD, ALEXANDER · 2013 to 2014
$60k
Medical Research Council MC_PC_U127561093Medical Research Council MC_U127561093NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG003988NHGRI NIH HHS R01HG003988NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG003991NHGRI NIH HHS R01HG003991NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG006997NHGRI NIH HHS U54HG006997NIDCR NIH HHS 1R01DE01963NIDCR NIH HHS 1R01DE021708NIDCR NIH HHS 1U01DE020054NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE019638NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE021708NIDCR NIH HHS U01 DE020054NIDCR NIH HHS U01 DE020060NIDCR NIH HHS U01DE020060NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM105202
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The shape of the human face and skull is largely genetically determined. However, the genomic basis of craniofacial morphology is incompletely understood and hypothesized to involve protein-coding genes, as well as gene regulatory sequences. We used a combination of epigenomic profiling, in vivo characterization of candidate enhancer sequences in transgenic mice, and targeted deletion experiments to examine the role of distant-acting enhancers in craniofacial development. We identified complex regulatory landscapes consisting of enhancers that drive spatially complex developmental expression patterns. Analysis of mouse lines in which individual craniofacial enhancers had been deleted revealed significant alterations of craniofacial shape, demonstrating the functional importance of enhancers in defining face and skull morphology. These results demonstrate that enhancers are involved in craniofacial development and suggest that enhancer sequence variation contributes to the diversity of human facial morphology.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalAnimalsCraniofacial AbnormalitiesEnhancer Elements, GeneticEpigenesis, GeneticFaceGene Expression ProfilingGene TargetingMaxillofacial DevelopmentMiceMice, TransgenicSequence DeletionSkull

Identifiers

PMID24159046
PMCPMC3991470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.