ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2014
Single-copy quantification of HIV-1 in clinical samples.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Targeted bacteriophage T4 nanoparticles reverse HIV-1 latency in human T cell line models.iScience · 2025Article
- The development, evaluation, performance, and validation of micro-PCR and extractor for the quantification of HIV-1 &-2 RNA.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Safety and efficacy of an oncolytic viral strategy using bortezomib with ICE/R in relapsed/refractory HIV-positive lymphomas.Blood advances · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
HIV replication in humans proceeds with substantial viral RNA levels in plasma. Antiretroviral therapy results in suppression but not eradication of HIV infection. Continuous therapy is essential for durable clinical responses. Discontinuing antiretroviral therapy results in prompt rebound in viremia. The source of HIV during suppressive therapy and mechanisms of persistence remain uncertain. Sensitive assays for HIV have been useful in quantifying viremia in response to antiretroviral therapy and in experimental studies of drug intensification, drug simplification, and potential anatomic sanctuary site investigations. As clinical eradication strategies move forward, robust, sensitive quantitative assays for HIV at low levels represent essential laboratory support modalities. Here we describe in detail an assay for HIV-1 RNA with single-copy sensitivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.