Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24158456›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2013

A modeling approach for compounds affecting body composition.

Peter Gennemark, Rasmus Jansson-Löfmark, Gina Hyberg, Maria Wigstrand, Dorota Kakol-Palm, Pernilla Håkansson, Daniel Hovdal, Peter Brodin, Maria Fritsch-Fredin, Madeleine Antonsson and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A predictive model of rat calorie intake as a function of diet energy density.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2018
    Article
  4. Modeling energy intake and body weight effects of a long-acting amylin analogue.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Modeling energy intake by adding homeostatic feedback and drug intervention.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Peter GennemarkCVMD iMED DMPK AstraZeneca R&D, 431 83, Mölndal, Sweden, peter.gennemark@astrazeneca.com.
Rasmus Jansson-Löfmark
Gina Hyberg
Maria Wigstrand
Dorota Kakol-Palm
Pernilla Håkansson
Daniel Hovdal
Peter Brodin
Maria Fritsch-Fredin
Madeleine Antonsson
Karolina Ploj
Johan Gabrielsson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Body composition and body mass are pivotal clinical endpoints in studies of welfare diseases. We present a combined effort of established and new mathematical models based on rigorous monitoring of energy intake (EI) and body mass in mice. Specifically, we parameterize a mechanistic turnover model based on the law of energy conservation coupled to a drug mechanism model. Key model variables are fat-free mass (FFM) and fat mass (FM), governed by EI and energy expenditure (EE). An empirical Forbes curve relating FFM to FM was derived experimentally for female C57BL/6 mice. The Forbes curve differs from a previously reported curve for male C57BL/6 mice, and we thoroughly analyse how the choice of Forbes curve impacts model predictions. The drug mechanism function acts on EI or EE, or both. Drug mechanism parameters (two to three parameters) and system parameters (up to six free parameters) could be estimated with good precision (coefficients of variation typically <20 % and not greater than 40 % in our analyses). Model simulations were done to predict the EE and FM change at different drug provocations in mice. In addition, we simulated body mass and FM changes at different drug provocations using a similar model for man. Surprisingly, model simulations indicate that an increase in EI (e.g. 10 %) was more efficient than an equal lowering of EI. Also, the relative change in body mass and FM is greater in man than in mouse at the same relative change in either EI or EE. We acknowledge that this assumes the same drug mechanism impact across the two species. A set of recommendations regarding the Forbes curve, vehicle control groups, dual action on EI and loss, and translational aspects are discussed. This quantitative approach significantly improves data interpretation, disease system understanding, safety assessment and translation across species.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsAppetite DepressantsBody CompositionBody WeightDiet, High-FatDrug DiscoveryEnergy IntakeEnergy MetabolismFemaleHumansMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLObesityAppetite Depressants

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.