Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24158349›Full record

ArticleChest2014

Do grandmaternal smoking patterns influence the etiology of childhood asthma?

Laura L Miller, John Henderson, Kate Northstone, Marcus Pembrey, Jean Golding

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Chest, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Nicotine and the developing brain: Insights from preclinical models.Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. The Exposome Approach in Allergies and Lung Diseases: Is It Time to Define a Preconception Exposome?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. DNA methylation as a marker for prenatal smoke exposure in adults.International journal of epidemiology · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura L MillerSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, England.
John HendersonSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, England.
Kate NorthstoneSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, England.
Marcus PembreySchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, England.
Jean GoldingSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, England. Electronic address: jean.golding@bristol.ac.uk.
University of Bristol · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G1100226Medical Research Council G9815508Medical Research Council MC_PC_15018Wellcome Trust 092731Wellcome Trust 102215
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnimal data suggest that tobacco smoke exposure of a mother when she is in utero influences DNA methylation patterns in her offspring and that there is an effect on the respiratory system, particularly airway responsiveness. The only study, to our knowledge, in humans suggests that there is a similar effect on asthma. The present study tests whether an association with respiratory problems can be confirmed in a large population study and aims to determine whether in utero exposure of the father has similar effects on his offspring.

methodsInformation from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children was used to compare the offspring of women and of men who had themselves been exposed to cigarette smoke in utero; separate analyses were performed for children of women smokers and nonsmokers. The outcome measures were trajectories of history of early wheezing, doctor-diagnosed asthma by age 7 years, and results of lung function and methacholine challenge tests at 8 years. A variety of social and environmental factors were taken into account; offspring sexes were examined separately.

resultsThere was no association with any outcome in relation to maternal prenatal exposure. There was some evidence of an increase in asthma risk with paternal prenatal exposure when the study mother was a nonsmoker (adjusted OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.97-1.41). This was particularly strong for girls (adjusted OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.04-1.86).

conclusionsWe did not find that maternal prenatal exposure to her mother's smoking had any effect on her children's respiratory outcomes. There was suggestive evidence of paternal prenatal exposure being associated with asthma and persistent wheezing in the granddaughters.

Indexed as

Cohort EffectFamily RelationsPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsSex FactorsAsthmaBronchial Provocation TestsChildFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesLungMaleMethacholine ChlorideOutcome Assessment, Health CarePregnancyRespiratory Function TestsMethacholine Chloride

Identifiers

PMID24158349
PMCPMC4042509
OpenAlexW2111051652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.