Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24157811›Full record

ReviewCancer letters2014

One mouse, one patient paradigm: New avatars of personalized cancer therapy.

Prerna Malaney, Santo V Nicosia, Vrushank Davé

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer letters, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 154 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
154citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

154 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Personalized functional profiling usingCancer biology & therapy · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

94 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Prerna MalaneyMorsani College of Medicine, Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
Santo V NicosiaMorsani College of Medicine, Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
Vrushank DavéMorsani College of Medicine, Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Tampa, FL 33612, USA; Department of Molecular Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA. Electronic address: vdave@health.usf.edu.

Funding

SPORE in Lung CancerP50CA119997 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI GABRILOVICH, DMITRY I · 2008 to 2012
$11.0M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA119997
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last few decades, study of cancer in mouse models has gained popularity. Sophisticated genetic manipulation technologies and commercialization of these murine systems have made it possible to generate mice to study human disease. Given the large socio-economic burden of cancer, both on academic research and the health care industry, there is a need for in vivo animal cancer models that can provide a rationale that is translatable to the clinic. Such a bench-to-bedside transition will facilitate a long term robust strategy that is economically feasible and clinically effective to manage cancer. The major hurdles in considering mouse models as a translational platform are the lack of tumor heterogeneity and genetic diversity, which are a hallmark of human cancers. The present review, while critical of these pitfalls, discusses two newly emerging concepts of personalized mouse models called "Mouse Avatars" and Co-clinical Trials. Development of "Mouse Avatars" entails implantation of patient tumor samples in mice for subsequent use in drug efficacy studies. These avatars allow for each patient to have their own tumor growing in an in vivo system, thereby allowing the identification of a personalized therapeutic regimen, eliminating the cost and toxicity associated with non-targeted chemotherapeutic measures. In Co-clinical Trials, genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs) are used to guide therapy in an ongoing human patient trial. Murine and patient trials are conducted concurrently, and information obtained from the murine system is applied towards future clinical management of the patient's tumor. The concurrent trials allow for a real-time integration of the murine and human tumor data. In combination with several molecular profiling techniques, the "Mouse Avatar" and Co-clinical Trial concepts have the potential to revolutionize the drug development and health care process. The present review outlines the current status, challenges and the future potential of these two new in vivo approaches in the field of personalized oncology.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsHumansMedical OncologyMiceMice, TransgenicNeoplasmsPrecision Medicine18FDG-PET18-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomographyAcute Promyelocytic LeukemiaAPLCo-clinical TrialDrug discoveryFDAGEMMsGenetically engineered mouse modelsgenetically enginereed mouse modelsHDAChistone deacetylaseMaterial Transfer AgreementMouse AvatarsMTANOD scid gammanon-small cell lung cancerNSCLCNSGpatient-derived tumor xenograftPDTXPersonalized medicinethe food and drug administrationXenograft models

Identifiers

PMID24157811
PMCPMC4092874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.