Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24157189›Full record

ArticleTuberculosis (Edinburgh, Scotland)2014

A new unifying theory of the pathogenesis of tuberculosis.

Ian M Orme

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tuberculosis (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 138 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. ImmunoTargets and therapy · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Bacterial biofilms in the human body: prevalence and impacts on health and disease.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  13. Microorganisms · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. AggregatedFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  20. Lactate Metabolism and Signaling in Tuberculosis and Cancer: A Comparative Review.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Review

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ian M OrmeDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA. Electronic address: ian.orme@colostate.edu.
Colorado State University · US

Funding

Response Therapies for MDR-TBU01AI070456 · NIAID · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ORME, IAN M · 2006 to 2010
$6.4M
NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI070456
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is set in stone that Mycobacterium tuberculosis is a facultative intracellular bacterial parasite. This axiom drives our knowledge of the host response, the way we design vaccines against the organism by generating protective T cells, and to a lesser extent, the way we try to target anti-microbial drugs. The purpose of this article is to commit total heresy. I believe that M. tuberculosis can equally well be regarded as an extracellular pathogen and may in fact spend a large percentage of its human lung "life-cycle" in this environment. It is of course intracellular as well, but this may well be little more than a brief interlude after infection of a new host during which the bacterium must replicate to increase its chances of transmission and physiologically adapt prior to moving back to an extracellular phase. As a result, by focusing almost completely on just the intracellular phase, we may be making serious strategic errors in the way we try to intervene in this pathogenic process. It is my opinion that when a TB bacillus enters the lungs and starts to reside inside an alveolar macrophage, its central driving force is to switch on a process leading to lung necrosis, since it is only by this process that the local lung tissue can be destroyed and the bacillus can be exhaled and transmitted. I present here a new model of the pathogenesis of the disease that attempts to unify the pathogenic process of infection, disease, persistence [rather than latency], and reactivation.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkersBronchoalveolar Lavage FluidGuinea PigsHost-Pathogen InteractionsImmunity, CellularLungMycobacterium tuberculosisTuberculosis, PulmonaryBiomarkersLatencyPersistenceReactivationTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID24157189
PMCPMC3877201
OpenAlexW1992027784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.