Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24156650›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2013

Biomarkers of lung epithelial injury and inflammation distinguish severe sepsis patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Lorraine B Ware, Tatsuki Koyama, Zhiguo Zhao, David R Janz, Nancy Wickersham, Gordon R Bernard, Addison K May, Carolyn S Calfee, Michael A Matthay

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 134 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
134citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

134 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 227 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Anesthetics to Prevent Lung Injury in Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia · 2022
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. The beta agonist lung injury trial prevention. A randomized controlled trial.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2014
    Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

74 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lorraine B Ware
Tatsuki Koyama
Zhiguo Zhao
David R Janz
Nancy Wickersham
Gordon R Bernard
Addison K May
Carolyn S Calfee
Michael A Matthay
Vanderbilt University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Resolution of Clinical Lung InjuryR37HL051856 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MATTHAY, MICHAEL A. · 2006 to 2015
$3.9M
Midcareer Investigator Award in Patient-Oriented Research in Acute Lung InjuryK24HL103836 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI WARE, LORRAINE B · 2010 to 2020
$1.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL081332NHLBI NIH HHS HL103836NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL103836NHLBI NIH HHS R37 HL051856
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite recent modifications, the clinical definition of the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains non-specific, leading to under-diagnosis and under-treatment. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that a biomarker panel would be useful for biologic confirmation of the clinical diagnosis of ARDS in patients at risk of developing ARDS due to severe sepsis.

methodsThis was a retrospective case control study of 100 patients with severe sepsis and no evidence of ARDS compared to 100 patients with severe sepsis and evidence of ARDS on at least two of their first four ICU days. A panel that included 11 biomarkers of inflammation, fibroblast activation, proteolytic injury, endothelial injury, and lung epithelial injury was measured in plasma from the morning of ICU day two. A backward elimination model building strategy on 1,000 bootstrapped data was used to select the best performing biomarkers for further consideration in a logistic regression model for diagnosis of ARDS.

resultsUsing the five best-performing biomarkers (surfactant protein-D (SP-D), receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE), interleukin-8 (IL-8), club cell secretory protein (CC-16), and interleukin-6 (IL-6)) the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.7 to 0.84) for the diagnosis of ARDS. The AUC improved to 0.82 (95% CI: 0.77 to 0.90) for diagnosis of severe ARDS, defined as ARDS present on all four of the first four ICU days.

conclusionsAbnormal levels of five plasma biomarkers including three biomarkers generated by lung epithelium (SP-D, RAGE, CC-16) provided excellent discrimination for diagnosis of ARDS in patients with severe sepsis. Altered levels of plasma biomarkers may be useful biologic confirmation of the diagnosis of ARDS in patients with sepsis, and also potentially for selecting patients for clinical trials that are designed to reduce lung epithelial injury.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkersCase-Control StudiesCritical CareDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansLung InjuryMaleMiddle AgedRespiratory Distress SyndromeRetrospective StudiesSepsisBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID24156650
PMCPMC4056313
OpenAlexW2100852364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.