ArticleBMC health services research2013
Stakeholder perspectives on implementing accreditation programs: a qualitative study of enabling factors.
Article in BMC health services research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Factors that influence the implementation of (inter)nationally endorsed health and social care standards: a systematic review and meta-summary.BMJ quality & safety · 2023Pooled it
- Impact of hospital accreditation on quality improvement in healthcare: A systematic review.PloS one · 2023Pooled it
- Mediators of change in healthcare organisations subject to external assessment: a systematic review with narrative synthesis.BMJ open · 2020Pooled it
- Does accreditation of general practice promote patient-reported quality of care? A natural cluster randomised experiment.BMJ open · 2020Trial
- ISO 9001 and JCI preparedness as drivers of quality improvement at a tertiary cardiac care center: a 5-year analysis from Pakistan.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2026Article
- Barriers in Implementing the Accreditation Standards for a Safe Environment in Public Hospitals of Rwanda: A Qualitative Study.Rwanda journal of medicine and health sciences · 2025Article
- Factors influencing the establishment of hospital accreditation programs in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.Health policy and planning · 2025Article
- Voices on academic accreditation: lived experiences of nurse educators, administrators, students, and alumni in nursing education.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Article
- The Governance, Policy, Process, and Capacity of Health Workforce Regulation and Accreditation: Qualitative Policy Analysis and Evidence from Palestine.Journal of healthcare leadership · 2024Article
- Perceptions of Chinese hospital leaders on joint commission international accreditation: a qualitative study.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- What GPs do to meet accreditation standards - implementation activities and perceived improvements attributed to general practice accreditation.BMC primary care · 2022Article
- Australian chiropractic students' perceptions of education: validation of a questionnaire.The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association · 2021Article
- Perception of Hospital Accreditation Impact among Quality Management Professionals in India: A Survey-Based Multicenter Study.Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare · 2021Article
- Implementation of healthcare accreditation in Danish general practice: a questionnaire study exploring general practitioners' perspectives on external support.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2021Article
- Inspecting teams' and organisations' expectations regarding external inspections in health care: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2020Article
- Are Councils on Chiropractic Education expectations of chiropractic graduates changing for the better: a comparison of similarities and differences of the graduate competencies of the Chiropractic Council on Education-Australasia from 2009 to 2017.Chiropractic & manual therapies · 2020Article
- Accreditation as a management tool: a national survey of hospital managers' perceptions and use of a mandatory accreditation program in Denmark.BMC health services research · 2020Article
- Challenges of implementation of hospital accreditation in Iran: an exploratory factor analysis.The Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association · 2020Article
- Implementation of government-directed policy in the hospital setting: a modified Delphi study.Health research policy and systems · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccreditation programs are complex, system-wide quality and safety interventions. Despite their international popularity, evidence of their effectiveness is weak and contradictory. This may be due to variable implementation in different contexts. However, there is limited research that informs implementation strategies. We aimed to advance knowledge in this area by identifying factors that enable effective implementation of accreditation programs across different healthcare settings.
methodsWe conducted 39 focus groups and eight interviews between 2011 and 2012, involving 258 diverse healthcare stakeholders from every Australian State and Territory. Interviews were semi-structured and focused on the aims, implementation and consequences of three prominent accreditation programs in the aged, primary and acute care sectors. Data were thematically analysed to distil and categorise facilitators of effective implementation.
resultsFour factors were identified as critical enablers of effective implementation: the accreditation program is collaborative, valid and uses relevant standards; accreditation is favourably received by health professionals; healthcare organisations are capable of embracing accreditation; and accreditation is appropriately aligned with other regulatory initiatives and supported by relevant incentives.
conclusionsStrategic implementation of accreditation programs should target the four factors emerging from this study, which may increase the likelihood of accreditation being implemented successfully.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.