ReviewCancer medicine2013
Toward a universal treatment for cancer: cell inflation assisted chemotherapy.
Review in Cancer medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of AP-1 in self-sufficient proliferation and migration of cancer cells and its potential impact on an autocrine/paracrine loop.Oncotarget · 2018Article
- Selective anticancer activity of hydroxyapatite/chitosan-poly(d,l)-lactide-co-glycolide particles loaded with an androstane-based cancer inhibitor.Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces · 2016Article
- Mechanisms and therapeutic effectiveness of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in oncology.Cancer medicine · 2016Review
- Protecting the normal in order to better kill the cancer.Cancer medicine · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancers show considerable genetic and functional heterogeneity, preventing the development of a universal anticancer drug. Here, I argue that it is nevertheless possible to elaborate a therapeutic strategy that can be used in almost every cancer, exploiting the negative feedback effect of normal cells on the proliferation of their precursors. This method, termed cell inflation assisted chemotherapy, is aimed at blocking normal cell division prior to high-dose antimitotic chemotherapy. Evidence for a negative feedback effect on granulocyte production suggests that it is possible to prevent neutropenia by transfusion of autologous granulocytes. In a first step, this protocol will be devised to protect neutrophils and to prevent granulopenia in patients treated with intensive chemotherapy. In its simplest form, it will consist of a leukapheresis-storage-reinjection sequence just prior to drug administration. Then, if the proof of concept is established, a more systematic use of intensive cell cycle-specific chemotherapy, together with protection of other lineages through temporary mitotic blockade might be a treatment applicable for most cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.