Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24155927›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2013

Vaccine-induced boosting of influenza virus-specific CD4 T cells in younger and aged humans.

Douglas V Dolfi, Kathleen D Mansfield, Raj K Kurupati, Senthil Kannan, Susan A Doyle, Hildegund C J Ertl, Kenneth E Schmader, E John Wherry

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Diminished B-Cell Response After Repeat Influenza Vaccination.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2019
    Article
  9. Poor Immunogenicity, Not Vaccine Strain Egg Adaptation, May Explain the Low H3N2 Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in 2012-2013.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2018
    Article
  10. Augmented CD4NPJ vaccines · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. The Predominant CD4Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Douglas V DolfiInstitute for Immunology, Department of Microbiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Kathleen D Mansfield
Raj K Kurupati
Senthil Kannan
Susan A Doyle
Hildegund C J Ertl
Kenneth E Schmader
E John Wherry
The Wistar Institute · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USDuke Medical Center · USDurham VA Medical Center · US

Funding

Virology CoreU19AI082630 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI RAYMOND T CHUNG, GEORG Michael LAUER · 2009 to 2026
$48.1M
Resource Core 3 - Metabolomics CoreP30AG028716 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Virginia B Kraus · 2006 to 2026
$24.6M
The Impact of Bacterial Co-Infectin on Respiratory Virus-Specific T cell ResponseU19AI083022 · NIAID · WISTAR INSTITUTE · PI ERIKSON, JAN S. · 2009 to 2013
$10.7M
NIAID NIH HHS AI082630NIAID NIH HHS AI083022NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI082630NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI083022NIA NIH HHS P30 AG028716PHS HHS A1078897
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current yearly influenza virus vaccines induce strain-specific neutralizing antibody (NAb) responses providing protective immunity to closely matched viruses. However, these vaccines are often poorly effective in high-risk groups such as the elderly and challenges exist in predicting yearly or emerging pandemic influenza virus strains to include in the vaccines. Thus, there has been considerable emphasis on understanding broadly protective immunological mechanisms for influenza virus. Recent studies have implicated memory CD4 T cells in heterotypic immunity in animal models and in human challenge studies. Here we examined how influenza virus vaccination boosted CD4 T cell responses in younger versus aged humans. Our results demonstrate that while the magnitude of the vaccine-induced CD4 T cell response and number of subjects responding on day 7 did not differ between younger and aged subjects, fewer aged subjects had peak responses on day 14. While CD4 T cell responses were inefficiently boosted against NA, both HA and especially nucleocaspid protein- and matrix-(NP+M) specific responses were robustly boosted. Pre-existing CD4 T cell responses were associated with more robust responses to influenza virus NP+M, but not H1 or H3. Finally pre-existing strain-specific NAb decreased the boosting of CD4 T cell responses. Thus, accumulation of pre-existing influenza virus-specific immunity in the form of NAb and cross-reactive T cells to conserved virus proteins (e.g. NP and M) over a lifetime of exposure to infection and vaccination may influence vaccine-induced CD4 T cell responses in the aged.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAgingAntibodies, NeutralizingCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationDemographyFemaleHumansInfluenza VaccinesKineticsMaleOrthomyxoviridaeSpecies SpecificityVaccines, InactivatedAntibodies, NeutralizingInfluenza VaccinesVaccines, InactivatedViral Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24155927
PMCPMC3796569
OpenAlexW2126816086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.