GuidelineApplied clinical informatics2013
STARE-HI - Statement on Reporting of Evaluation Studies in Health Informatics: explanation and elaboration.
Guideline in Applied clinical informatics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Electronic Tools to Bridge the Language Gap in Health Care for People Who Have Migrated: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Pooled it
- The impact of health information technology on prescribing errors in hospitals: a systematic review and behaviour change technique analysis.Systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Problems with health information technology and their effects on care delivery and patient outcomes: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2017Pooled it
- The Effects of Artificial Intelligence in Quality Assessment of Outpatient Mental Health Services on Human Auditors.Applied clinical informatics · 2026Article
- An Explanation User Interface for Artificial Intelligence-Supported Mechanical Ventilation Optimization for Clinicians: User-Centered Design and Formative Usability Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Characterization and validation of electronic medical record data for pharmacoepidemiologic research.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Clinical Informatics Education to Advance Learning Health Systems: A Scoping Review.Learning health systems · 2026Article
- Interactive Toolkit for Classifying Digital Health Interventions, Services, and Applications Based on the WHO Framework.Journal of medical systems · 2025Article
- LogMyScan: A pilot evaluation study of a mobile phone-based ultrasound logbook application.Ultrasound (Leeds, England) · 2024Article
- Assessing the Usage and Usability of a Mental Health Advice Telephone Service in Uganda: Mixed Methods Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Usability, Engagement, and Report Usefulness of Chatbot-Based Family Health History Data Collection: Mixed Methods Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- The Effect of an Electronic Medical Record-Based Clinical Decision Support System on Adherence to Clinical Protocols in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Care: Interrupted Time Series Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Article
- Capturing the pulse: a state-of-the-art review on camera-based jugular vein assessment.Biomedical optics express · 2023Review
- Moderated digital social therapy for young people with emerging mental health problems: A user-centered mixed-method design and usability study.Frontiers in digital health · 2022Article
- Usability, Feasibility, and Effect of a Biocueing Intervention in Addition to a Moderated Digital Social Therapy-Platform in Young People With Emerging Mental Health Problems: A Mixed-Method Approach.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Replication studies in the clinical decision support literature-frequency, fidelity, and impact.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021Article
- Mobile Health for Smoking Cessation Among Disadvantaged Young Women During and After Pregnancy: User-Centered Design and Usability Study.JMIR formative research · 2021Article
- Students' perceptions on their use of an EHR: pilot questionnaire study.BMJ health & care informatics · 2020Review
- Safety concerns with consumer-facing mobile health applications and their consequences: a scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020Article
- A review of measurement practice in studies of clinical decision support systems 1998-2017.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImproving the quality of reporting of evaluation studies in health informatics is an important requirement towards the vision of evidence-based health informatics. The STARE-HI - Statement on Reporting of Evaluation Studies in health informatics, published in 2009, provides guidelines on the elements to be contained in an evaluation study report.
objectivesTo elaborate on and provide a rationale for the principles of STARE-HI and to guide authors and readers of evaluation studies in health informatics by providing explanatory examples of reporting.
methodsA group of methodologists, researchers and editors prepared the present elaboration of the STARE-HI statement and selected examples from the literature.
resultsThe 35 STARE-HI items to be addressed in evaluation papers describing health informatics interventions are discussed one by one and each is extended with examples and elaborations.
conclusionThe STARE-HI statement and this elaboration document should be helpful resources to improve reporting of both quantitative and qualitative evaluation studies. Evaluation manuscripts adhering to the principles will enable readers of such papers to better place the studies in a proper context and judge their validity and generalizability, and thus in turn optimize the exploitation of the evidence contained therein. LIMITATIONS: This paper is based on experiences of a group of editors, reviewers, authors of systematic reviews and readers of the scientific literature. The applicability of the details of these principles has to evolve as a function of their use in practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.