Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24155315›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2013

Strabismus disrupts binocular synaptic integration in primary visual cortex.

Benjamin Scholl, Andrew Y Y Tan, Nicholas J Priebe

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Acuity-independent effects of visual deprivation on human visual cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Adaptive, social, and repetitive behaviors in children with autism spectrum disorder and comorbid amblyopia and/or strabismus.Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus · 2026
    Article
  4. A Critical Look at Critical Periods.Annual review of vision science · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Interocular Suppression in Primary Visual Cortex in Strabismus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Characterization of Intelligence in Children with Exotropia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Benjamin SchollCenter for Perceptual Systems, Section of Neurobiology, School of Biological Sciences, College of Natural Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78705.
Andrew Y Y Tan
Nicholas J Priebe
The University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

CPS Training ProgramT32EY021462 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI Mary M Hayhoe, Alexander C Huk · 2012 to 2026
$2.5M
Cortical Integration of Binocular InputR01EY019288 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI PRIEBE, NICHOLAS J · 2009 to 2012
$1.5M
NEI NIH HHS EY-019288NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019288NEI NIH HHS T32 EY021462
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual disruption early in development dramatically changes how primary visual cortex neurons integrate binocular inputs. The disruption is paradigmatic for investigating the synaptic basis of long-term changes in cortical function, because the primary visual cortex is the site of binocular convergence. The underlying alterations in circuitry by visual disruption remain poorly understood. Here we compare membrane potential responses, observed via whole-cell recordings in vivo, of primary visual cortex neurons in normal adult cats with those of cats in which strabismus was induced before the developmental critical period. In strabismic cats, we observed a dramatic shift in the ocular dominance distribution of simple cells, the first stage of visual cortical processing, toward responding to one eye instead of both, but not in complex cells, which receive inputs from simple cells. Both simple and complex cells no longer conveyed the binocular information needed for depth perception based on binocular cues. There was concomitant binocular suppression such that responses were weaker with binocular than with monocular stimulation. Our estimates of the excitatory and inhibitory input to single neurons indicate binocular suppression that was not evident in synaptic excitation, but arose de novo because of synaptic inhibition. Further constraints on circuit models of plasticity result from indications that the ratio of excitation to inhibition evoked by monocular stimulation decreased mainly for nonpreferred eye stimulation. Although we documented changes in synaptic input throughout primary visual cortex, a circuit model with plasticity at only thalamocortical synapses is sufficient to account for our observations.

Indexed as

Synaptic PotentialsVision, BinocularAction PotentialsAnimalsCatsDepth PerceptionExotropiaModels, NeurologicalNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsVisual Cortex

Identifiers

PMID24155315
PMCPMC3807032
OpenAlexW2041131600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.