Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24154962›Full record

ArticleActa neuropathologica2014

Glioblastomas are composed of genetically divergent clones with distinct tumourigenic potential and variable stem cell-associated phenotypes.

Daniel Stieber, Anna Golebiewska, Lisa Evers, Elizabeth Lenkiewicz, Nicolaas H C Brons, Nathalie Nicot, Anaïs Oudin, Sébastien Bougnaud, Frank Hertel, Rolf Bjerkvig and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neuropathologica, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 119 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Chromosomal Instability Drives Glioblastoma Heterogeneity and Therapeutic Opportunities.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Glioma Stem Cells: Novel Data Obtained by Single-Cell Sequencing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Glioblastoma CD105Acta neuropathologica communications · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. A2B5 Expression in Central Nervous System and Gliomas.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Daniel StieberNorLux Neuro-Oncology Laboratory, Department of Oncology, Centre de Recherche Public de la Santé (CRP-Santé), 84, Val Fleuri, 1526, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Anna Golebiewska
Lisa Evers
Elizabeth Lenkiewicz
Nicolaas H C Brons
Nathalie Nicot
Anaïs Oudin
Sébastien Bougnaud
Frank Hertel
Rolf Bjerkvig
Laurent Vallar
Michael T Barrett
Simone P Niclou
Laboratoire National de Santé · LUTranslational Genomics Research Institute · USCentre Hospitalier de Luxembourg · LUUniversity of Bergen · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is known to be a heterogeneous disease; however, the genetic composition of the cells within a given tumour is only poorly explored. In the advent of personalised medicine the understanding of intra-tumoural heterogeneity at the cellular and the genetic level is mandatory to improve treatment and clinical outcome. By combining ploidy-based flow sorting with array-comparative genomic hybridization we show that primary GBMs present as either mono- or polygenomic tumours (64 versus 36%, respectively). Monogenomic tumours were limited to a pseudodiploid tumour clone admixed with normal stromal cells, whereas polygenomic tumours contained multiple tumour clones, yet always including a pseudodiploid population. Interestingly, pseudodiploid and aneuploid fractions carried the same aberrations as defined by identical chromosomal breakpoints, suggesting that evolution towards aneuploidy is a late event in GBM development. Interestingly, while clonal heterogeneity could be recapitulated in spheroid-based xenografts, we find that genetically distinct clones displayed different tumourigenic potential. Moreover, we show that putative cancer stem cell markers including CD133, CD15, A2B5 and CD44 were present on genetically distinct tumour cell populations. These data reveal the clonal heterogeneity of GBMs at the level of DNA content, tumourigenic potential and stem cell marker expression, which is likely to impact glioma progression and treatment response. The combined knowledge of intra-tumour heterogeneity at the genetic, cellular and functional level is crucial to assess treatment responses and to design personalized treatment strategies for primary GBM.

Indexed as

PhenotypeAnimalsBiopsyCarcinogenesisCell Line, TumorCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsDNA Copy Number VariationsDNA, NeoplasmFlow CytometryGlioblastomaHeterograftsHumansMiceMice, Inbred NODMice, SCIDNeoplastic Stem CellsDNA, Neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID24154962
PMCPMC3895194
OpenAlexW2128662106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.