ReviewWiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)2013
Unclassified cardiomyopathies in neuromuscular disorders.
Review in Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unusual Evolution of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy in Non-Compaction Myocardium in a Pompe Disease Patient.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- The Feline Cardiomyopathies: 1. General concepts.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2021Article
- Article
- Left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy: cardiac, neuromuscular, and genetic factors.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2017Review
- Successful management of Barth syndrome: a systematic review highlighting the importance of a flexible and multidisciplinary approach.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesUnclassified cardiomyopathies (CMPs) include left ventricular hypertrabeculation or noncompaction (LVHT) and Takotsubo syndrome (TTS). Unclassified CMPs are frequently associated with noncardiac disease, including neuromuscular disorders (NMDs). This review aims at summarizing and discussing recent findings concerning the association of NMDs with unclassified CMPs.
methodsLiterature search using the database PubMed from 1966 to June 2013 was performed.
resultsLVHT has been described in association with dystrophinopathies, myotonic dystrophies, zaspopathies, laminopathies, dystrobrevinopathies, oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy, tropomyosin-1 mutations, multiminicore disease, Danon disease, mitochondrial disorders, myoadenylate deaminase deficiency, Pompe's disease, glycogen storage disease-IV, fatty acid oxidation disorder, Barth syndrome, ryanodine receptor mutation, inclusion body myopathy, dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa, Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy, hereditary cobolamine deficiency, beta-thalassemia, poliomyelitis, and Friedreich ataxia. Takotsubo syndrome has been described in association with myasthenia gravis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Guillain-Barre syndrome, rhabdomyolysis, mitochondrial disorder, hypokalemia-related myopathy, syndrome malin, hereditary sensorimotor neuropathy, Beals syndrome, polymyalgia rheumatica, and unclassified myopathy. It is important for treating physicians to know about these associations because treatment and outcome of LVHT, including artificial ventilation, are determined by the presence or absence of an NMD. There are also indications that LVHT in NMDs favors the development of TTS.
conclusionsLVHT and TTS may be associated with NMDs. The pathogenetic link between unclassified CMPs and NMDs remains elusive. Outcome of LVHT and treatment of TTS are additionally determined by the presence or absence of an NMD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.