Trial reportDer Orthopade2013
[Significance of sonographically guided percutaneous needle biopsy in the diagnostics of soft tissue tumors].
Trial report in Der Orthopade, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe role of percutaneous needle biopsy in the diagnostics of soft tissue tumors is controversially discussed. The specificity of this method has been examined in this study based on the collective of patients treated in our university hospital. Secondly, the influence of the specialization of the treating surgeon has been evaluated. PATIENTS AND
methodsThis study included 96 patients who underwent percutaneous needle biopsy and, if necessary, surgical resection. The specificity, logistic requirements and possible complications of percutaneous biopsy were evaluated. Special attention was paid to the influence of specialization of the treating surgical team on the specificity of the method.
resultsThe results of the biopsy were able to define the entity of the lesion correctly in 69.7 %, the dignity in 75.0 % and the grading in 72.0 % of the cases. In the group treated by a specialized team, the specificity of the method was 84.6 % concerning the entity of the lesion, 84.6 % concerning the dignity and 80 % concerning the grading. With regard to the entity the specificity was significantly increased (p < 0.05).
conclusionThe findings show that percutaneous needle biopsy represents a logistically simple and efficient diagnostic method for soft tissue tumors which is rarely associated with complications. Subsequent treatment should be performed in a specialized centre.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.