Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24153367›Full record

ReviewNature chemistry2013

The past, present and potential for microfluidic reactor technology in chemical synthesis.

Katherine S Elvira, Xavier Casadevall i Solvas, Robert C R Wootton, Andrew J deMello

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature chemistry, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 172 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
172citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

172 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A Machine Vision Perspective on Droplet-Based Microfluidics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Continuous-Flow and Scalable Synthesis of Pd@PtThe journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

112 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katherine S ElviraDepartment of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, Institute for Chemical and Bioengineering, ETH Zurich, Wolfgang-Pauli Strasse 10, Zurich, 8093, Switzerland.
Xavier Casadevall i Solvas
Robert C R Wootton
Andrew J deMello

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The past two decades have seen far-reaching progress in the development of microfluidic systems for use in the chemical and biological sciences. Here we assess the utility of microfluidic reactor technology as a tool in chemical synthesis in both academic research and industrial applications. We highlight the successes and failures of past research in the field and provide a catalogue of chemistries performed in a microfluidic reactor. We then assess the current roadblocks hindering the widespread use of microfluidic reactors from the perspectives of both synthetic chemistry and industrial application. Finally, we set out seven challenges that we hope will inspire future research in this field.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomedical ResearchChemical IndustryGreen Chemistry TechnologyMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesMicrofluidicsOrganic ChemicalsOrganic Chemicals

Identifiers

PMID24153367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.