ArticleThe oncologist2013
Barriers to study enrollment in patients with advanced cancer referred to a phase I clinical trials unit.
Article in The oncologist, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- "When Offered to Participate": A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Patient Agreement to Participate in Cancer Clinical Trials.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2021Pooled it
- Strategies addressing barriers to clinical trial enrollment of underrepresented populations: a systematic review.Contemporary clinical trials · 2014Pooled it
- Financial Burden of Cancer Clinical Trial Participation and the Impact of a Cancer Care Equity Program.The oncologist · 2016Trial
- Telemedicine as a gateway to early-phase oncology trials: lessons from 14 000 patients and future directions for global access and equity.The oncologist · 2026Article
- Decision-making about clinical trial options among older patients with metastatic cancer who have exhausted standard therapies.Journal of geriatric oncology · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
- Before Consent: Qualitative Analysis of Deliberations of Patients With Advanced Cancer About Early-Phase Clinical Trials.JCO oncology practice · 2020Article
- Improving Patient Participation in Cancer Clinical Trials: A Qualitative Analysis of HSRProj & RePORTER.Studies in health technology and informatics · 2019Article
- Referrals to a Phase I Clinic and Trial Enrollment in the Molecular Screening Era.The oncologist · 2019Article
- Antiangiogenesis and gene aberration-related therapy may improve overall survival in patients with concurrent KRAS and TP53 hotspot mutant cancer.Oncotarget · 2017Article
- Continuous anti-angiogenic therapy after tumor progression in patients with recurrent high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer: phase I trial experience.Oncotarget · 2016Article
- A Case-Control Study Brings to Light the Causes of Screen Failures in Phase 1 Cancer Clinical Trials.PloS one · 2016Article
- Recognizing the Financial Burden of Cancer Patients in Clinical Trials.The oncologist · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
unlabelledWe conducted this retrospective study to identify reasons that patients referred to a phase I clinical trial failed to enroll or delayed enrollment onto the trial. MATERIALS AND
methodsOutcome analyses were conducted independently on data collected from electronic medical records of two sets of consecutive patients referred to a phase I clinical trial facility at MD Anderson Cancer Center. Data from the first set of 300 patients were used to determine relevant variables affecting enrollment; data from the second set of 957 patients were then analyzed for these variables.
resultsResults from the two sets of patients were similar. Approximately 55% of patients were enrolled in a phase I trial. Patients referred from within MD Anderson were more likely to be enrolled than patients seen originally outside the institution (p = .006); black patients were more likely than white patients to enroll (69% vs. 43%; p = .04). The median interval from the initial visit to initiation of treatments was 19 days. Major reasons for failure to enroll included failure to return to the clinic (36%), opting for treatment in another clinic (17%), hospice referral (11%), early death (10%), and lack of financial clearance (5%). Treatment was delayed for three weeks or more in 250 patients; in 85 patients (34%), the delay was caused by financial and insurance issues.
conclusionFailure to return to the clinic, pursuit of other therapy, and rapid deterioration were the major reasons for failure to enroll; lengthy financial clearance was the most common reason for delayed enrollment onto a phase I trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.