Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24153060›Full record

ReviewViruses2013

CD8 and CD4 T cells in west nile virus immunity and pathogenesis.

Jason Netland, Michael J Bevan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Viruses, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cellular Immune Response in Horses After West Nile Neuroinvasive Disease.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Extracellular Vesicles and Their Use as Vehicles of Immunogens.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  8. Virus-Induced CD8Vaccines · 2021
    Article
  9. Simultaneous CD8Vaccines · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Zika Virus Vaccine Development.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2017
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jason NetlandDepartment of Immunology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98109, USA. mbevan@uw.edu.
Michael J Bevan

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CD4 and CD8 T lymphocytes are adaptive immune cells that play a key role in the immune response to pathogens. They have been extensively studied in a variety of model systems and the mechanisms by which they function are well described. However, the responses by these cell types vary widely from pathogen to pathogen. In this review, we will discuss the role of CD8 and CD4 T cells in the immune response to West Nile virus infection.

Indexed as

AnimalsCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesHumansWest Nile FeverWest Nile virus

Identifiers

PMID24153060
PMCPMC3814605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.