Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24153053›Full record

Trial reportBMC health services research2013

Effectiveness of two interventions based on improving patient-practitioner communication on diabetes self-management in patients with low educational level: study protocol of a clustered randomized trial in primary care.

Ignacio Ricci-Cabello, Antonio Olry de Labry-Lima, Julia Bolívar-Muñoz, Guadalupe Pastor-Moreno, Clara Bermudez-Tamayo, Isabel Ruiz-Pérez, Fermín Quesada-Jiménez, Enrique Moratalla-López, Susana Domínguez-Martín, Ana M de los Ríos-Álvarez and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC health services research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01849731 (Effectiveness of Two Interventions in Patients With Low Educational Level With Diabetes to Reduce Inequalities in Self-care Behavior), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01849731 nacompletednot on this map

Effectiveness of Two Interventions in Patients With Low Educational Level With Diabetes to Reduce Inequalities in Self-care Behavior

TypeinterventionalSponsorAndalusian School of Public HealthRan2011Enrolled184ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus Type 2ArmsFace-to-face, Face-to-face intervention plus telephone reinforcement
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ignacio Ricci-Cabello
Antonio Olry de Labry-Lima
Julia Bolívar-Muñoz
Guadalupe Pastor-Moreno
Clara Bermudez-Tamayo
Isabel Ruiz-PérezEscuela Andaluza de Salud Pública, Campus Universitario de Cartuja, Cuesta del Observatorio 4, Apdo, 2070, 18080, Granada, Spain. isabel.ruiz.easp@juntadeandalucia.es.
Fermín Quesada-Jiménez
Enrique Moratalla-López
Susana Domínguez-Martín
Ana M de los Ríos-Álvarez
Pilar Cruz-Vela
Miguel A Prados-Quel
José A López-De Hierro

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the last decades the presence of social inequalities in diabetes care has been observed in multiple countries, including Spain. These inequalities have been at least partially attributed to differences in diabetes self-management behaviours. Communication problems during medical consultations occur more frequently to patients with a lower educational level. The purpose of this cluster randomized trial is to determine whether an intervention implemented in a General Surgery, based in improving patient-provider communication, results in a better diabetes self-management in patients with lower educational level. A secondary objective is to assess whether telephone reinforcement enhances the effect of such intervention. We report the design and implementation of this on-going study. METHODS/

designThe study is being conducted in a General Practice located in a deprived neighbourhood of Granada, Spain. Diabetic patients 18 years old or older with a low educational level and inadequate glycaemic control (HbA1c > 7%) were recruited. General Practitioners (GPs) were randomised to three groups: intervention A, intervention B and control group. GPs allocated to intervention groups A and B received training in communication skills and are providing graphic feedback about glycosylated haemoglobin levels. Patients whose GPs were allocated to group B are additionally receiving telephone reinforcement whereas patients from the control group are receiving usual care. The described interventions are being conducted during 7 consecutive medical visits which are scheduled every three months. The main outcome measure will be HbA1c; blood pressure, lipidemia, body mass index and waist circumference will be considered as secondary outcome measures. Statistical analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of the interventions will include multilevel regression analysis with three hierarchical levels: medical visit level, patient level and GP level. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will provide new knowledge about possible strategies to promote a better diabetes self-management in a particularly vulnerable group. If effective, this low cost intervention will have the potential to be easily incorporated into routine clinical practice, contributing to decrease health inequalities in diabetic patients.

trial registrationClinical Trials U.S. National Institutes of Health, NCT01849731.

Indexed as

Educational StatusPhysician-Patient RelationsClinical ProtocolsCommunicationDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleGlycated HemoglobinHealth LiteracyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareProgram EvaluationReminder SystemsSelf CareGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, human

Identifiers

PMID24153053
PMCPMC4016588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.