ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2015
TMS over V5 disrupts motion prediction.
Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contextual Modulation of Primary Visual Cortex by Temporal Predictability During Motion Extrapolation.Brain and behavior · 2025Article
- The Representational Organization of Static and Dynamic Visual Features in the Human Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Article
- Synthetic surprise as the foundation of the psychedelic experience.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2024Review
- Dissociating representations of affect and motion in visual cortices.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2023Article
- The speed and temporal frequency of visual apparent motion modulate auditory duration perception.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Seeing and extrapolating motion trajectories share common informative activation patterns in primary visual cortex.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- Human perceptual and metacognitive decision-making rely on distinct brain networks.PLoS biology · 2022Article
- Non-stimulated regions in early visual cortex encode the contents of conscious visual perception.Human brain mapping · 2022Article
- Unraveling the Neural Mechanisms Which Encode Rapid Streams of Visual Input.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022Article
- Resolving visual motion through perceptual gaps.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2021Review
- Intensity- and timing-dependent modulation of motion perception with transcranial magnetic stimulation of visual cortex.Neuropsychologia · 2020Article
- Neural responses to apparent motion can be predicted by responses to non-moving stimuli.NeuroImage · 2020Article
- Apparent Motion Induces Activity Suppression in Early Visual Cortex and Impairs Visual Detection.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020Article
- Application of long-interval paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation to motion-sensitive visual cortex does not lead to changes in motion discrimination.Neuroscience letters · 2020Article
- Evaluating the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing as a model of perception.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2020Review
- Suppressive Traveling Waves Shape Representations of Illusory Motion in Primary Visual Cortex of Awake Primate.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019Article
- fNIRS Responses in Professional Violinists While Playing Duets: Evidence for Distinct Leader and Follower Roles at the Brain Level.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
- Object Representations in Human Visual Cortex Formed Through Temporal Integration of Dynamic Partial Shape Views.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018Article
- Predictive feedback to V1 dynamically updates with sensory input.Scientific reports · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Given the vast amount of sensory information the brain has to deal with, predicting some of this information based on the current context is a resource-efficient strategy. The framework of predictive coding states that higher-level brain areas generate a predictive model to be communicated via feedback connections to early sensory areas. Here, we directly tested the necessity of a higher-level visual area, V5, in this predictive processing in the context of an apparent motion paradigm. We flashed targets on the apparent motion trace in-time or out-of-time with the predicted illusory motion token. As in previous studies, we found that predictable in-time targets were better detected than unpredictable out-of-time targets. However, when we applied functional magnetic resonance imaging-guided, double-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over left V5 at 13-53 ms before target onset, the detection advantage of in-time targets was eliminated; this was not the case when TMS was applied over the vertex. Our results are causal evidence that V5 is necessary for a prediction effect, which has been shown to modulate V1 activity (Alink et al. 2010). Thus, our findings suggest that information processing between V5 and V1 is crucial for visual motion prediction, providing experimental support for the predictive coding framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.