Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24152537›Full record

Trial reportTrials2013

Incidence of unanticipated difficult airway using an objective airway score versus a standard clinical airway assessment: the DIFFICAIR trial - trial protocol for a cluster randomized clinical trial.

Anders Kehlet Nørskov, Charlotte Valentin Rosenstock, Jørn Wetterslev, Lars Hyldborg Lundstrøm

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01718561 nacompletednot on this map

Incidence of Unanticipated Difficult Airway Using an Objective Airway Score Versus a Standard Clinical Airway Assessment, The DIFFICAIR Trial - A Cluster-randomized Clinical Trial on 28 Anaesthesia Departments With 70,000 Patients Registered in the Danish Anaesthesia Database

TypeinterventionalSponsorHillerod Hospital, DenmarkRan2012 to 2014Enrolled76,058ConditionsAirway Management, Intubation, IntratrachealArmsSARI
NCT03341507 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

A Comparative Study Between the Rigid Tube for Laryngoscopy, as a New Tool for Tracheal Intubation, and McIntosh Laryngoscope in Difficult Airway Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorIuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and PharmacyRan2017 to 2019Enrolled64ConditionsIntubation, DifficultArmsclassical laryngoscopy, rigid tube for laryngoscopy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Danish Anaesthesia Database.Clinical epidemiology · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anders Kehlet NørskovDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Nordsjælland Hospital, 3400, Hillerød, Denmark. anderskehlet@hotmail.com.
Charlotte Valentin Rosenstock
Jørn Wetterslev
Lars Hyldborg Lundstrøm

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPre-operative airway assessment in Denmark is based on a non-specific clinical assessment. Systematic, evidence-based and consistent airway assessment may reduce the incidence of unanticipated difficult airway management. By assessing multiple predictors for difficult airway management, the predictive value of the assessment increases. The Simplified Airway Risk Index (SARI) is a multivariate risk score for predicting difficult intubation.This study aims to compare the use of the SARI with a non-specified clinical airway assessment on predicting difficult intubation. Further, to compare the examination and registration of predictors for difficult mask ventilation with a non-specified clinical airway assessment on prediction of difficult mask ventilation. METHOD/

designWe cluster-randomized 28 Danish departments of anaesthesia to airway assessment either by the SARI or by usual non-specific assessment. Data from patients' pre-operative airway assessment are registered in the Danish Anaesthesia Database. Objective scores for intubation and mask ventilation grade the severity of airway managements. The accuracy of predicting difficult intubation and mask ventilation is measured for each group. The primary outcome measure is the fraction of unanticipated difficult and easy intubation.The fraction of unanticipated difficult intubation in Denmark is 1.87%. With a stratified randomization, type 1 error risk of 5% and a power of 80%, 30 departments are required to detect or reject a 30% relative risk reduction equalling a number needed to treat of 180. Sample size estimation is adjusted for the study design and based on standards for randomization on cluster-level. With an average cluster size of 2,500 patients, 70,000 patients will be enrolled over a 1-year trial period. The database is programmed so that registration of the SARI and predictors for difficult mask ventilation are mandatory for the intervention group but invisible to controls. DISCUSSION: It is innovative to use a national clinical database as the basis for a randomized clinical trial. The method can serve as a precedent for implementation of evidence-based recommendations and database registration.The trial will forward understanding of how to predict and reduce unanticipated difficult airways and how to produce evidence-based recommendations for airway assessment and clinical database development.

trial registration(NCT01718561).

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesResearch DesignClinical ProtocolsDenmarkHumansIntubation, IntratrachealLaryngeal MasksLaryngoscopyMultivariate AnalysisPreoperative CareRespiration, ArtificialRisk AssessmentRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID24152537
PMCPMC3842741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.