Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24152449›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2013

The Liverpool Care Pathway for the dying: what went wrong?

Daniel Knights, Diana Wood, Stephen Barclay

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Refined utilitarianism in practice: reinterpreting the ethical foundations of the NHS.Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. 'Please make comfortable': prescribing opioids in the wake of Gosport.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. In defence of the 'tick-box approach': why end-of-life care is no exception.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2016
    Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Living in uncertain times: trajectories to death in residential care homes.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2014
    Article
  15. Death's worsening taboo: is hampering the provision of high quality palliative care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2014
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel KnightsClinical Medical Student, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge.
Diana Wood
Stephen Barclay

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Critical PathwaysEnglandHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicQuality of Health CareTerminal Care

Identifiers

PMID24152449
PMCPMC3782767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.