ArticleAnalytical chemistry2013
SILAC surrogates: rescue of quantitative information for orphan analytes in spike-in SILAC experiments.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of Quantification and Normalization Strategies for Phosphoprotein Phosphatase Affinity Proteomics: Application to Breast Cancer Signaling.Journal of proteome research · 2023Article
- Profiling the Skeletal Muscle Proteome in Patients on Atypical Antipsychotics and Mood Stabilizers.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Kinome Profiling Reveals Abnormal Activity of Kinases in Skeletal Muscle From Adults With Obesity and Insulin Resistance.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2020Article
- A Biologist's Field Guide to Multiplexed Quantitative Proteomics.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2016Review
- QuantFusion: Novel Unified Methodology for Enhanced Coverage and Precision in Quantifying Global Proteomic Changes in Whole Tissues.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Super-stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (Super-SILAC) enables the sensitive and accurate analysis of complex biological tissue and tumor samples by comparison of light peptides observed in biological samples to heavy peptides from SILAC cell culture spike-ins. However, despite the use of multiple cell lines for Super-SILAC spike-in standards, the full protein and peptide profiles of biological samples are not completely represented in these internal standards, leading to orphan analytes for which sample to standard ratios cannot be calculated. This problem is exacerbated in some biological systems, such as muscle tissue, which lack adequate cell culture lines to reflect their complex and idiosyncratic protein profiles, resulting in up to 40% of peptide analytes without heavy cognates. Furthermore, these unquantified orphan analytes may be among the most biologically interesting and significant species, since their presence is not common to cell lines cultured in vitro. Here, we report on the development of a surrogate analysis strategy to interpolate quantitative relationships between peptide species, observed across multiple biological samples, which lack representation within the spike-in standards. The precision and accuracy of this method was assessed by replicate experiments in which surrogate-derived ratios from defined mixtures of spike-in SILAC standard and tissue lysate were compared against traditional SILAC ratios for species where both light and heavy peptide cognates were observed. We demonstrate the robustness of our SILAC surrogates strategy across a variety of murine tissues, including liver, spleen, brain, and muscle. Our approach increases the quantitative coverage and precision within a biological sample by rescuing previously intractable peptide species and applying additional evidence to improve the precision of existing quantifications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.