Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24151930›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2015

The impact of concordant and discordant comorbidities on patient-assessed quality of diabetes care.

Eindra Aung, Maria Donald, Joseph Coll, Jo Dower, Gail M Williams, Suhail A R Doi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Electronic health records improve clinical note quality.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eindra AungSchool of Population Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
Maria DonaldSchool of Population Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
Joseph CollSchool of Population Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
Jo DowerSchool of Population Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
Gail M WilliamsSchool of Population Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
Suhail A R DoiSchool of Population Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the impact of concordant and discordant comorbidities on patients' assessments of providers' adherence to diabetes-specific care guidelines and quality of chronic illness care. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsA population-based survey of 3761 adults with type 2 diabetes, living in Queensland, Australia was conducted in 2008. Based on self-reports, participants were grouped into four mutually exclusive comorbid categories: none, concordant only, discordant only and both concordant and discordant. Outcome measures included patient-reported providers' adherence to guideline-recommended care and the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC), which measures care according to the Chronic Care Model. Analyses using the former measure included logistic regressions, and the latter measure included univariate analysis of variance, both unadjusted and adjusted for sampling region, gender, age, educational attainment, diabetes duration and treatment status.

resultsHaving concordant comorbidities increased the odds of patient-reported providers' adherence for 7 of the 11 guideline-recommended care activities in unadjusted analyses. However, the effect remained significant for only two provider activities (reviews of medication and/or complications and blood pressure examinations) when adjusted. A similar pattern was found for the both concordant and discordant comorbidity category. The presence of discordant comorbidities influenced only one provider activity (blood pressure examinations). No association between comorbidity type and the overall PACIC score was found.

conclusionsComorbidity type is associated with diabetes-specific care, but does not seem to influence broader aspects of chronic illness care directly. Providers need to place more emphasis on care activities which are not comorbidity-specific and thus transferable across different chronic conditions.

Indexed as

Chronic DiseaseComorbidityGuideline AdherenceQuality of Health CareAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDiabetes ComplicationsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2HumansLongitudinal StudiesMiddle AgedPatient ParticipationPrimary Health CareProspective StudiesQueenslandchronic illness carecomorbiditydiabetesguideline adherencepatient perspectivesquality of care

Identifiers

PMID24151930
PMCPMC5060868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.