Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24151482›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2013

The role of oxytocin in familiarization-habituation responses to social novelty.

Mattie Tops, Renske Huffmeijer, Mariëlle Linting, Karen M Grewen, Kathleen C Light, Sander L Koole, Marian J Bakermans-Kranenburg, Marinus H van Ijzendoorn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Trust Games and Beyond.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mattie TopsCentre for Child and Family Studies, Leiden University Leiden, Netherlands ; Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University Leiden, Netherlands ; Department of Clinical Psychology, VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Renske Huffmeijer
Mariëlle Linting
Karen M Grewen
Kathleen C Light
Sander L Koole
Marian J Bakermans-Kranenburg
Marinus H van Ijzendoorn

Funding

PRENATAL COCAINE AND NEUROBEHAVIORAL FACTORS UNDERLYING MOTHER-INFANT INTERACTIONP01DA022446 · NIDA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI JOHNS, JOSEPHINE M. · 2008 to 2015
$10.2M
NIDA NIH HHS P01 DA022446
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stress or arousal responses to novel social contexts ease off when individuals get familiar with the social context. In the present study we investigated whether oxytocin is involved in this process of familiarization-habituation as oxytocin is known to increase trust and decrease anxiety. Fifty-nine healthy female subjects took part in the same experimental procedure in two sessions separated by 4 weeks. In the first (novelty) session state trust scores were significantly positively correlated with salivary oxytocin levels while in the second (familiarity) session state trust scores were significantly negatively correlated with salivary oxytocin levels. In a path model oxytocin was associated with increased trust in the novelty session and trust was associated with decreased oxytocin levels in the familiarity session. The results are consistent with the idea that oxytocin decreases stress-to-novelty responses by promoting familiarization to novel social contexts.

Indexed as

familiarityfamiliarization-habituation responsenoveltyoxytocinstress habituationtrust

Identifiers

PMID24151482
PMCPMC3798760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.