ArticleFrontiers in psychology2013
Uncovering phenotypes of poor-pitch singing: the Sung Performance Battery (SPB).
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of vocal-motor interference on vocal pitch imitation.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025Article
- Genetic factors and shared environment contribute equally to objective singing ability.iScience · 2022Article
- Musical abilities in children with developmental cerebellar anomalies.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2022Article
- Effects of Visual and Auditory Feedback in Violin and Singing Voice Pitch Matching Tasks.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Verbal and Musical Short-Term Memory: Evidence for Shared Serial Order Processes?Psychologica Belgica · 2019Article
- A comparison of serial order short-term memory effects across verbal and musical domains.Memory & cognition · 2018Article
- Uncovering beat deafness: detecting rhythm disorders with synchronized finger tapping and perceptual timing tasks.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2015Article
- Neurological and developmental approaches to poor pitch perception and production.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2015Review
- Moving to the Beat and Singing are Linked in Humans.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2015Article
- On drawing a line through the spectrogram: how do we understand deficits of vocal pitch imitation?Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Singing is as natural as speaking for humans. Increasing evidence shows that the layman can carry a tune (e.g., when asked to sing a well-known song or to imitate single pitches, intervals and short melodies). Yet, important individual differences exist in the general population with regard to singing proficiency. Some individuals are particularly inaccurate or imprecise in producing or imitating pitch information (poor-pitch singers), thus showing a variety of singing phenotypes. Unfortunately, so far there is not a standard set of tasks for assessing singing proficiency in the general population, allowing to uncover and characterize individual profiles of poor-pitch singing. Different tasks and analysis methods are typically used in various experiments, making the comparison of the results across studies arduous. To fill this gap we propose here a new tool for assessing singing proficiency (the Sung Performance Battery, SPB). The SPB starts from the assessment of participants' vocal range followed by five tasks: (1) single-pitch matching, (2) pitch-interval matching, (3) novel-melody matching, (4) singing from memory of familiar melodies (with lyrics and on a syllable), and (5) singing of familiar melodies (with lyrics and on a syllable) at a slow tempo indicated by a metronome. Data analysis via acoustical methods provides objective measures of pitch accuracy and precision in terms of absolute and relative pitch. The SPB has been tested in a group of 50 occasional singers. The results indicate that the battery is useful for characterizing proficient singing and for detecting cases of inaccurate and/or imprecise singing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.