Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24151158›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of comparative neurology2014

Neurogenesis in the lamprey central nervous system following spinal cord transection.

Guixin Zhang, Ivonne Vidal Pizarro, Gary P Swain, Shin H Kang, Michael E Selzer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of comparative neurology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The neural stem cell properties of Pkd2l1Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Guixin ZhangShriners Hospitals Pediatric Research Center, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Penhnsylvania, 19140; Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104.
Ivonne Vidal Pizarro
Gary P Swain
Shin H Kang
Michael E Selzer
University of Pennsylvania · USShriners Hospitals for Children · USTemple University · US

Funding

Center for experimental neurorehabilitation trainingR24HD050838 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SELZER, MICHAEL EDGAR · 2005 to 2012
$3.7M
GUIDANCE MOLECULES IN SPINAL CORD REGENERATIONR01NS038537 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SELZER, MICHAEL EDGAR · 2000 to 2009
$3.5M
REGENERATION IN THE SPINAL CORD--ROLE OF NEUROFILAMENTSR01NS014837 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SELZER, MICHAEL EDGAR · 1986 to 2003
$1.4M
ROLE OF GLIAL DESMOSOMES IN SPINAL CORD REGENERATIONF31NS011009 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI VIDAL PIZARRO, IVONNE · 1999 to 2003
$65k
GROWTH CONE GUIDANCE IN THE SPINAL CORDR01NS025581 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SELZER, MICHAEL EDGAR · 1988 to 1997
–
NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD050838NINDS NIH HHS F31 NS011009NINDS NIH HHS NS-11009NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS014837NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS038537NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS-14837NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS-25581
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After spinal cord transection, lampreys recover functionally and axons regenerate. It is not known whether this is accompanied by neurogenesis. Previous studies suggested a baseline level of nonneuronal cell proliferation in the spinal cord and rhombencephalon (where most supraspinal projecting neurons are located). To determine whether cell proliferation increases after injury and whether this includes neurogenesis, larval lampreys were spinally transected and injected with 5-bromo-2&prime-deoxyuridine (BrdU) at 0-3 weeks posttransection. Labeled cells were counted in the lesion site, within 0.5 mm rostral and caudal to the lesion, and in the rhombencephalon. One group of animals was processed in the winter and a second group was processed in the summer. The number of labeled cells was greater in winter than in summer. The lesion site had the most BrdU labeling at all times, correlating with an increase in the number of cells. In the adjacent spinal cord, the percentage of BrdU labeling was higher in the ependymal than in nonependymal regions. This was also true in the rhombencephalon but only in summer. In winter, BrdU labeling was seen primarily in the subventricular and peripheral zones. Some BrdU-labeled cells were also double labeled by antibodies to glial-specific (antikeratin) as well as neuron-specific (anti-Hu) antigens, indicating that both gliogenesis and neurogenesis occurred after spinal cord transection. However, the new neurons were restricted to the ependymal zone, were never labeled by antineurofilament antibodies, and never migrated away from the ependyma even at 5 weeks after BrdU injection. They would appear to be cerebrospinal fluid-contacting neurons.

Indexed as

AnimalsBromodeoxyuridineCell ProliferationCentral Nervous SystemKeratinsLampreysNerve Tissue ProteinsNeurogenesisSpinal Cord InjuriesBromodeoxyuridineKeratinsNerve Tissue ProteinsBrdUgliogenesislampreyneurogenesisproliferationspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID24151158
PMCPMC3959235
OpenAlexW1841607379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.