ArticleMicrobiologyOpen2013
Comparative study of normal and sensitive skin aerobic bacterial populations.
Article in MicrobiologyOpen, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analysis of the Facial Skin Bacterial Community in Vietnamese Individuals with Sensitive Skin and Clinical Relevance.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Article
- Scraping enhances microbial DNA recovery over swabbing in sensitive facial skin: a pilot study of 10 patients.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A Review of Next-Generation Probiotics-As a Gateway to Biotherapeutics.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2025Review
- Article
- Lysine-Dendrimer, a New Non-Aggressive Solution to Rebalance the Microbiota of Acne-Prone Skin.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- Airborne bacterial species in indoor air and association with physical factors.UCL open. Environment · 2023Article
- Cotton and Flax Textiles Leachables Impact Differently CutaneousLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Effects ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Draft Genome Sequences of Four Commensal Strains ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2021Article
- Analysis of the Bacterial Flora of Sensitive Facial Skin Among Women in Guangzhou.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2021Article
- Correlation Between Facial Skin Microbiota and Skin Barriers in a Chinese Female Population with Sensitive Skin.Infection and drug resistance · 2021Article
- Review
- Structures of the Skin Microbiome and Mycobiome Depending on Skin Sensitivity.Microorganisms · 2020Article
- Draft Genome Sequences of Micrococcus luteus MFP06 and MFP07, Isolated from the Skin of Healthy Volunteers.Microbiology resource announcements · 2020Article
- Host Starvation and Female Sex Influence Enterobacterial ClpB Production: A Possible Link to the Etiology of Eating Disorders.Microorganisms · 2020Article
- Deleterious Effects of an Air Pollutant (NOFrontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Draft Genome Sequence of Lactobacillus crispatus Strain V4, Isolated from a Vaginal Swab from a Young Healthy Nonmenopausal Woman.Microbiology resource announcements · 2019Article
- Effect of two cosmetic compounds on the growth, biofilm formation activity, and surface properties of acneic strains of Cutibacterium acnes and Staphylococcus aureus.MicrobiologyOpen · 2019Article
- Mechanism of action of the moonlighting protein EfTu as a Substance P sensor in Bacillus cereus.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Probiotic Potential and Safety Evaluation ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate if the sensitive skin syndrome, a frequent skin disorder characterized by abnormal painful reactions to environmental factors in the absence of visible inflammatory response, could be linked to a modification in the skin bacterial population. A total of 1706 bacterial isolates was collected at the levels of the forehead, cheekbone, inner elbow, and lower area of the scapula on the skin of normal and sensitive skin syndrome-suffering volunteers of both sexes and of different ages. Among these isolates, 21 strains were randomly selected to validate in a first step the Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization (MALDI)-Biotyper process as an efficient identification tool at the group and genus levels, by comparison to API(®) strips and 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing identification techniques. In a second step, identification of the skin microbiota isolates by the MALDI-Biotyper tool allowed to pinpoint some differences in terms of bacterial diversity with regard to the collection area, and the volunteer's age and gender. Finally, comparison of the skin microbiota from normal and sensitive skin syndrome-suffering volunteers pointed out gender-related variations but no detectable correlation between a phylum, a genus or a dominant bacterial species and the sensitive skin phenotype. This study reveals that there is no dysbiosis of aerobic cultivable bacteria associated with the sensitive skin syndrome and further demonstrates that the MALDI-Biotyper is a powerful technique that can be efficiently employed to the study of cultivable human skin bacteria. To our knowledge, this is the first study focusing on bacteria in the sensitive skin syndrome. These results are of potential importance for pharmaceutical and cosmetic industries, which are looking for new strategies to treat this multiparametric disorder.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.