Observational studyHigh blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension2014
Clinical management of patients with hypertension and high cardiovascular risk: main results of an Italian survey on blood pressure control.
Observational study in High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of spironolactone on dialysis patients with refractory hypertension: a randomized controlled study.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2014Trial
- Article
- Attitudes and preferences for the clinical management of hypertension and hypertension-related cerebrovascular disease in the general practice: results of the Italian hypertension and brain survey.Clinical hypertension · 2017Article
- Attitudes and preferences for the clinical management of hypertension and hypertension-related cardiac disease in general practice: results of the Italian Hypertension and Heart Survey.Journal of human hypertension · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHypertension management and control still represents a major clinical challenge for physicians, as well as for National Health Care Systems, since high blood pressure (BP) levels in treated uncontrolled outpatients are related to a persistently increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) events. The Italian Society of Hypertension (SIIA) has prompted several educational interventions for improving BP control in Italy.
aimTo evaluate clinical attitudes and preferences of large community sample of both specialized physicians and general practitioners, included in an educational program, endorsed by SIIA and aimed at improving interventions for achieving better BP control in Italy.
methodsA predefined questionnaire, which included a main body with 17 questions and 15 specific items (3-4 questions for each item), was anonymously administered to a large community sample of physicians who have practice in managing outpatients with hypertension and high CV risk profile. Both specialized physicians and general practitioners, distributed throughout the whole Italian territory, have been included in this educational program. Data were reported into a computerised spreadsheet and centrally analysed. Confidentiality of the data were guaranteed during each phase of the study.
resultsFrom a total of 64 questions, 557 physicians (478 male, mean age 54.2 ± 7.1 years, average age of medical activity 28.0 ± 8.1 years), among which 261 (46.9 %) specialised physicians and 296 (53.1 %) general practitioners, provided 60,713 answers to the survey questionnaire. Physicians devote time and effort for achieving the recommended BP targets (<140/90 and <130/80 mmHg in high risk subgroups), yet they reported a very high rate of BP control (about 70 %). Concomitant presence of diabetes, cardiac and renal organ damage (35-50 %), as well as comorbidities (20-35 %), is reported to be high and able to impact on antihypertensive treatment's efficacy. Appropriate BP assessment is also viewed as a key tool for verifying effectiveness of a given drug therapy. Beyond non-pharmacological options, ACE inhibitors and ARBs were considered to most useful, effective and well tolerated options to start and maintain antihypertensive treatment, thus adding diuretics or calcium-channel blockers if needed. Direct renin inhibitors was considered to be effective in difficult to treat hypertension and to provide sustained antihypertensive efficacy.
conclusionsWith the well-known limitations of an observational, cross-sectional survey, in which a predefined questionnaire was administered to physicians rather than collecting data from medical databases, this study provides useful and updated information on attitudes and preferences, as well as on difficulties and troubles for physicians when managing outpatients with hypertension and high CV risk profile in Italy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.