ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2014
Assessment of calf muscle fatigue during submaximal exercise using transcranial magnetic stimulation versus transcutaneous motor nerve stimulation.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Methodological issues with the assessment of voluntary activation using transcranial magnetic stimulation in the knee extensors.European journal of applied physiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeFew studies have assessed the time-dependent response of fatigue (i.e., loss of force) during submaximal exercise without the use of maximum contractions. There is unexplored potential in the use of the superimposed muscle twitch (SIT), evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) or motor nerve stimulation (MNS), to assess fatigue during voluntary submaximal contractions. For the human triceps surae muscles, there are also no data on TMS-evoked twitches.
methodsTo optimise the TMS stimulus for assessment of fatigue, we first tested the effects of TMS power (40, 55, 70, 85, 100% max) on SIT force during contractions (0-100% MVC in 10% increments) in six subjects. Then, we compared SIT responses (TMS and MNS) during submaximal contractions and MVCs (all at 60 s intervals) during a continuous protocol of intermittent contractions (30% MVC) consisting of consecutive 5 min periods of baseline, fatigue (ischaemia) and recovery.
resultsFor TMS, SIT force increased as a diminishing function of TMS power (P < 0.05), the relationships between SIT force and the force of voluntary contraction at all TMS powers were parabolic, and SIT force was maximised at ~20-40% MVC. During intermittent contractions, MVC and SIT forces were stable during baseline, decreased similarly during ischaemia by 40-50% (P < 0.05), and recovered similarly to baseline values (P > 0.05) before the end of the protocol.
conclusionTMS can be used to evoke twitches during submaximal contractions of the human calf muscle and, along with MNS, used to assess fatigue during submaximal exercise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.