ArticleEuropean biophysics journal : EBJ2014
Effects of environmental factors on MSP21-25 aggregation indicate the roles of hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions in the aggregation process.
Article in European biophysics journal : EBJ, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Merozoite surface protein 2 (MSP2), one of the most abundant proteins on the merozoite surface of Plasmodium falciparum, is recognized to be important for the parasite's invasion into the host cell and is thus a promising malaria vaccine candidate. However, mediated mainly by its conserved N-terminal 25 residues (MSP21-25), MSP2 readily forms amyloid fibril-like aggregates under physiological conditions in vitro, which impairs its potential as a vaccine component. In addition, there is evidence that MSP2 exists in aggregated forms on the merozoite surface in vivo. To elucidate the aggregation mechanism of MSP21-25 and thereby understand the behavior of MSP2 in vivo and find ways to avoid the aggregation of relevant vaccine in vitro, we investigated the effects of agitation, pH, salts, 1-anilinonaphthalene-8-sulfonic acid (ANS), trimethylamine N-oxide dihydrate (TMAO), urea, and sub-micellar sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) on the aggregation kinetics of MSP21-25 using thioflavin T (ThT) fluorescence. The results showed that MSP21-25 aggregation was accelerated by agitation, while repressed by acidic pHs. The salts promoted the aggregation in an anion nature-dependent pattern. Hydrophobic surface-binding agent ANS and detergent urea repressed MSP21-25 aggregation, in contrast to hydrophobic interaction strengthener TMAO, which enhanced the aggregation. Notably, sub-micellar SDS, contrary to its micellar form, promoted MSP21-25 aggregation significantly. Our data indicated that hydrophobic interactions are the predominant driving force of the nucleation of MSP21-25 aggregation, while the elongation is controlled mainly by electrostatic interactions. A kinetic model of MSP21-25 aggregation and its implication were also discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.