Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24150417›Full record

ReviewNature materials2013

Stimuli-responsive nanocarriers for drug delivery.

Simona Mura, Julien Nicolas, Patrick Couvreur

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature materials, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1,438 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1,438citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1,438 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Control of Gemcitabine Activity With Blue and Red Light.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Timed metabolic repair after myocardial infarction.Nature cardiovascular research · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles in Biomedicine: Advances and Prospects.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Review
  15. Potential of Nanoparticle-Based Phototherapies for Future Treatment of Uveal Melanoma.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

1,378 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Simona MuraInstitut Galien Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Sud, UMR CNRS 8612, Faculté de Pharmacie, 5 rue Jean-Baptiste Clément, F-92296 Châtenay-Malabry Cedex, France.
Julien Nicolas
Patrick Couvreur

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spurred by recent progress in materials chemistry and drug delivery, stimuli-responsive devices that deliver a drug in spatial-, temporal- and dosage-controlled fashions have become possible. Implementation of such devices requires the use of biocompatible materials that are susceptible to a specific physical incitement or that, in response to a specific stimulus, undergo a protonation, a hydrolytic cleavage or a (supra)molecular conformational change. In this Review, we discuss recent advances in the design of nanoscale stimuli-responsive systems that are able to control drug biodistribution in response to specific stimuli, either exogenous (variations in temperature, magnetic field, ultrasound intensity, light or electric pulses) or endogenous (changes in pH, enzyme concentration or redox gradients).

Indexed as

Drug CarriersNanostructuresAnimalsClinical Trials as TopicHumansNanotechnologyDrug Carriers

Identifiers

PMID24150417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.