Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24150041›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin2014

Critical evaluation of auditory event-related potential deficits in schizophrenia: evidence from large-scale single-subject pattern classification.

Andres H Neuhaus, Florin C Popescu, Johannes Rentzsch, Jürgen Gallinat

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Schizophrenia: A Survey of Artificial Intelligence Techniques Applied to Detection and Classification.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andres H NeuhausDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany; andres.neuhaus@charite.de.
Florin C PopescuCompetence Center IT4Energy, Fraunhofer Institute for Open Communication Systems FOKUS, Berlin, Germany.
Johannes RentzschDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany;
Jürgen GallinatDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany;

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Event-related potential (ERP) deficits associated with auditory oddball and click-conditioning paradigms are among the most consistent findings in schizophrenia and are discussed as potential biomarkers. However, it is unclear to what extend these ERP deficits distinguish between schizophrenia patients and healthy controls on a single-subject level, which is of high importance for potential translation to clinical routine. Here, we investigated 144 schizophrenia patients and 144 matched controls with an auditory click-conditioning/oddball paradigm. P50 and N1 gating ratios as well as target-locked N1 and P3 components were submitted to conventional general linear models and to explorative machine learning algorithms. Repeated-measures ANOVAs revealed significant between-group differences for the oddball-locked N1 and P3 components but not for any gating measure. Machine learning-assisted analysis achieved 77.7% balanced classification accuracy using a combination of target-locked N1 and P3 amplitudes as classifiers. The superiority of machine learning over repeated-measures analysis for classifying schizophrenia patients was in the range of about 10% as quantified by receiver operating characteristics. For the first time, our study provides large-scale single-subject classification data on auditory click-conditioning and oddball paradigms in schizophrenia. Although our study exemplifies how automated inference may substantially improve classification accuracy, our data also show that the investigated ERP measures show comparably poor discriminatory properties in single subjects, thus illustrating the need to establish either new analytical approaches for these paradigms or other paradigms to investigate the disorder.

Indexed as

Data Interpretation, StatisticalAdolescentAdultAgedAnalysis of VarianceArtificial IntelligenceBiomarkersEvoked PotentialsEvoked Potentials, AuditoryFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSchizophreniaYoung AdultBiomarkersauditory oddballclickconditioningevent-related potentialsgatingmachine learningN1/N100P3/P300schizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID24150041
PMCPMC4133667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.