Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24150039›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2014

Massive habitat-specific genomic response in D. melanogaster populations during experimental evolution in hot and cold environments.

Ray Tobler, Susanne U Franssen, Robert Kofler, Pablo Orozco-Terwengel, Viola Nolte, Joachim Hermisson, Christian Schlötterer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Beyond Fixation: Persistent Genetic Variation Under Intense Selection.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Insect Models to Study Human Lipid Metabolism Disorders.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Experimental Evolution in a Warming World: The Omics Era.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Natural alleles at theProceedings. Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Understanding the biology of species' ranges: when and how does evolution change the rules of ecological engagement?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ray ToblerInstitut für Populationsgenetik, Vetmeduni Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Susanne U Franssen
Robert Kofler
Pablo Orozco-Terwengel
Viola Nolte
Joachim Hermisson
Christian Schlötterer

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 19467Austrian Science Fund FWF W 1225
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experimental evolution in combination with whole-genome sequencing (evolve and resequence [E&R]) is a promising approach to define the genotype-phenotype map and to understand adaptation in evolving populations. Many previous studies have identified a large number of putative selected sites (i.e., candidate loci), but it remains unclear to what extent these loci are genuine targets of selection or experimental noise. To address this question, we exposed the same founder population to two different selection regimes-a hot environment and a cold environment-and quantified the genomic response in each. We detected large numbers of putative selected loci in both environments, albeit with little overlap between the two sets of candidates, indicating that most resulted from habitat-specific selection. By quantifying changes across multiple independent biological replicates, we demonstrate that most of the candidate SNPs were false positives that were linked to selected sites over distances much larger than the typical linkage disequilibrium range of Drosophila melanogaster. We show that many of these mid- to long-range associations were attributable to large segregating inversions and confirm by computer simulations that such patterns could be readily replicated when strong selection acts on rare haplotypes. In light of our findings, we outline recommendations to improve the performance of future Drosophila E&R studies which include using species with negligible inversion loads, such as D. mauritiana and D. simulans, instead of D. melanogaster.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGenome, InsectSelection, GeneticAdaptation, BiologicalAnimalsCold TemperatureDrosophila melanogasterEcosystemGenetic Association StudiesGenetic VariationGenomicsHot TemperatureLinkage DisequilibriumPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSequence InversionSpecies SpecificityadaptationD. melanogasterevolutionary genomicsexperimental evolutionnext-generation sequencingstanding genetic variation

Identifiers

PMID24150039
PMCPMC3907058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.