Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24149818›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2013

Palm oil taxes and cardiovascular disease mortality in India: economic-epidemiologic model.

Sanjay Basu, Kim S Babiarz, Shah Ebrahim, Sukumar Vellakkal, David Stuckler, Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Nutrition and diabetes in South Asia.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2018
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sanjay BasuPrevention Research Center, and Center on Poverty and Inequality, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Kim S Babiarz
Shah Ebrahim
Sukumar Vellakkal
David Stuckler
Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert

Funding

CORE--PROGRAM DEVELOPMENTP30AG017253 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BHATTACHARYA, JAY · 1999 to 2019
$5.8M
Cost-effective chronic disease prevention in developing countriesK01AG037593 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GOLDHABER-FIEBERT, JEREMY DAVID · 2011 to 2015
$637k
NIA NIH HHS K01 AG037593NIA NIH HHS K01 AG037593-02NIA NIH HHS P30 AG017253Wellcome Trust 084674
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the potential effect of a tax on palm oil on hyperlipidemia and on mortality due to cardiovascular disease in India.

designEconomic-epidemiologic model. MODELING

methodsA microsimulation model of mortality due to myocardial infarction and stroke among Indian populations was constructed, incorporating nationally representative data on systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, tobacco smoking, diabetes, and cardiovascular event history, and stratified by age, sex, and urban/rural residence. Household expenditure data were used to estimate the change in consumption of palm oil following changes in oil price and the potential substitution of alternative oils that might occur after imposition of a tax. A 20% excise tax on palm oil purchases was simulated over the period 2014-23.

main outcome measuresThe model was used to project future mortality due to myocardial infarction and stroke, as well as the potential effect of a tax on food insecurity, accounting for the effect of increased food prices.

resultsA 20% tax on palm oil purchases would be expected to avert approximately 363,000 (95% confidence interval 247,000 to 479,000) deaths from myocardial infarctions and strokes over the period 2014-23 in India (1.3% reduction in cardiovascular deaths) if people do not substitute other oils for reduced palm oil consumption. Given estimates of substitution of palm oil with other oils following a 20% price increase for palm oil, the beneficial effects of increased polyunsaturated fat consumption would be expected to enhance the projected reduction in deaths to as much as 421,000 (256,000 to 586,000). The tax would be expected to benefit men more than women and urban populations more than rural populations, given differential consumption and cardiovascular risk. In a scenario incorporating the effect of taxation on overall food expenditures, the tax may increase food insecurity by <1%, resulting in 16,000 (95% confidence interval 12,000 to 22,000) deaths.

conclusionsCurtailing palm oil intake through taxation may modestly reduce hyperlipidemia and cardiovascular mortality, but with potential distributional consequences differentially benefiting male and urban populations, as well as affecting food security.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCardiovascular DiseasesCommerceFemaleFoodHumansHyperlipidemiasIndiaMaleMiddle AgedModels, EconomicPalm OilPlant OilsRisk FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsPalm OilPlant Oils

Identifiers

PMID24149818
PMCPMC4688552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.